Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl drama: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:22, 11 April 2008

Girl drama

Contested PROD. Seems to be a neologism with little notability and few to no reliable sources [Urban Dictionary doesn't count!]. RichardΩ6 12 17:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This seems to me to be a pretty textbook example of a non-notable neologism that does not belong in Wikipedia. ~ mazca ^talk 17:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Maybe a neologism, but definitely a WP:DICDEF. Even if there was some reliable source, it would belong in Wiktionary if at all.--Nsevs • Talk 17:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dictionary definition of a neologism citing no reliable sources. EALacey (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not a neologism, it is a popular slang term that encompasses several aspects of girl bullying in schools and teenage relationships. Refer to Chick flick for a Wikipedia article on a similar term. Jubeh (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources. And just a note that the above argument is not considered valid per this page.. Beeblbrox (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am trying to add more content to the article and to make it more reliable. I believe that it is not a WP:DICDEF since it can include a lot of content such as "effects on individuals/society" and "people's reactions towards girl drama". I also added several items in the "External Links" (some of them are links for books written on the subject, which can be used as references). We can use these links to expand the article (which I marked as a stub since it doesn't have much content yet). The reason why girl drama is interesting is that it relates to relational aggression, psychological abuse, bullying and also in some cases it leads to detrimental behavior and low self-esteem. For a while, I considered redirecting this article to relational aggression or bullying, however, I decided against this since it is not fully encompassed by either. I believe this article can serve as to provide information about this common cause of relational aggression and school-girl bullying as well as other aspects and issues that affect young women Jubeh (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment What is under debate here is not if such behavior exists, (I certainly wouldn't argue that point) but rather if this specific term is in widespread usage. Your sources must reflect that this term is in use to describe this type of behavior, otherwise this is original research. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Delete''' No [[WP:SOURCE|reliable sources]]. And just a note that the above  argument is not considered valid per [[WP:WAX|this page.]]. [[User:Beeblbrox|Beeblbrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblbrox|talk]]) 19:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' I am trying to add more content to the article and to make it more reliable. I believe that it is not a [[WP:DICDEF]] since it can include a lot of content such as "effects on individuals/society" and "people's reactions towards girl drama". I also added several items in the "External Links" (some of them are links for books written on the subject, which can be used as references). We can use these links to expand the article (which I marked as a stub since it doesn't have much content yet). The reason why girl drama is interesting is that it relates to relational aggression, psychological abuse, bullying and also in some cases it leads to detrimental behavior and low self-esteem. For a while, I considered redirecting this article to relational aggression or bullying, however, I decided against this since it is not fully encompassed by either. I believe this article can serve as to provide information about this common cause of relational aggression and school-girl bullying as well as other aspects and issues that affect young women [[User:Jubeh|Jubeh]] ([[User talk:Jubeh|talk]]) 20:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
-:*'''comment''' What is under debate here is not if such behavior exists, (I certainly wouldn't argue that point) but rather if ''this specific term'' is in widespread usage. Your [[WP:SOURCE|sources]] must reflect that this term is in used to describe this type of behavior, otherwise this is [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[User:Beeblbrox|Beeblbrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblbrox|talk]]) 20:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
+:*'''comment''' What is under debate here is not if such behavior exists, (I certainly wouldn't argue that point) but rather if ''this specific term'' is in widespread usage. Your [[WP:SOURCE|sources]] must reflect that this term is in use to describe this type of behavior, otherwise this is [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[User:Beeblbrox|Beeblbrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblbrox|talk]]) 20:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)