User talk:62.90.5.220: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:55, 13 April 2008

April 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Eleazar worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Wikiscient— 10:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please be advised that I have clearly made a constructive edit based on the relevant Verse. 62.90.5.220 (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there certainly does seem to be some confusion here. And I'm sure your edit was done in good faith, so I apologize if my revert seemed unduly abrupt.

Here's what we have:

Eleazar (or Elazar), (Hebrew: אֶלְעָזָר, Modern: Elʻazar, Tiberian: Elʻāzār, "God has helped") was a son of Aaron, a Levite priest and High Priest, and
Eliezer (Hebrew: אֱלִיעֶזֶר, Standard Eliʿézer, Tiberian ʾĔlîʿézer; "Help/Court of my God"), the second son of Moses and Zipporah according to Exodus (18:4).

Now, I take it that what prompted your edit was the line in the Eleazar article saying:

"According to the Documentary Hypothesis, in the Elohist (E) document, Eleazar is the son of Moses not Aaron."

Right?

I am neither a Torah nor a Hebrew scholar myself, so I really don't know what to make of that line. However, that being said, it seems fair enough to me. I think it should be sufficient, really, to just add something like: "(see also Eliezer)."

Don't you?

—Wikiscient— 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Please be advised that I have clearly made a constructive edit based on the relevant Verse. [[Special:Contributions/62.90.5.220|62.90.5.220]] ([[User talk:62.90.5.220#top|talk]]) 10:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
+:Well, there certainly does seem to be some confusion here.  And I'm sure your edit was done in [[WP:FAITH|good faith]], so I apologize if my revert seemed unduly abrupt.
+:Here's what we have:
+:* '''<u>[[Eleazar]]</u>''' (or '''Elazar'''),  ({{Hebrew Name|אֶלְעָזָר|Elʻazar|Elʻāzār|"[[Elohim|God]] has helped"}}) was a son of [[Aaron]], a [[Levite]] [[Kohen|priest]] and [[Kohen Gadol|High Priest]], and
+:* '''<u>[[Eliezer]]</u>''' ([[Hebrew language|Hebrew]]: '''אֱלִיעֶזֶר''', <small>[[Hebrew language#Modern Hebrew|Standard]]</small> {{Unicode|''Eliʿézer''}}, <small>[[Tiberian vocalization|Tiberian]]</small> {{Unicode|''ʾĔlîʿézer''}}; "Help/Court of my [[Elohim|God]]"), the second son of [[Moses]] and [[Zipporah]] according to  [[Exodus]] (18:4).
+:Now, I take it that what prompted your edit was the line in the [[Eleazar]] article saying:
+:* "According to the [[Documentary Hypothesis]], in the [[Elohist]] (E) document, Eleazar is the son of Moses not Aaron."
+:Right?
+:I am neither a [[Torah]] nor a [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] scholar myself, so I really don't know what to make of that line.  However, that being said, it seems fair enough to me.  I think it should be sufficient, really, to just add something like: "(see also [[Eliezer]])."
+:Don't you?
+:—[[User:Wikiscient|<span style="border:solid #408 1px;padding:1px"><span style='color:#20A;'>Wi</span><span style='color:#069;'>ki</span><span style='color:#096;'>sc</span><span style='color:#690;'>ie</span><span style='color:#940;'>nt</span></span>]]— 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)