Talk:Lochwinnoch: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
removed some pointless comments, added headers. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Village website issue== |
|||
Stop changing this page if you are not being productive, you freaks. |
|||
--- |
|||
Please stop posting inaccurate and defamatory comments |
|||
[[User:Bwiseman|Bwiseman]] ([[User talk:Bwiseman|talk]]) 06:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Which Parts of the Article are innaccurate and I will willingly excise them. |
|||
[[User:Frenum McSpleen|Frenum McSpleen]] ([[User talk:Frenum McSpleen|talk]]) 09:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
--- |
|||
The comments which have been removed are not intended to improve the village wikipedia entry but are aimed to cause disruption and extend a local grievance. Disagreements should not be brought into wikipedia. ([[User:Bwiseman|Bwiseman]] ([[User talk:Bwiseman|talk]]) 12:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)) |
The comments which have been removed are not intended to improve the village wikipedia entry but are aimed to cause disruption and extend a local grievance. Disagreements should not be brought into wikipedia. ([[User:Bwiseman|Bwiseman]] ([[User talk:Bwiseman|talk]]) 12:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)) |
||
Revision as of 07:47, 15 May 2008
Village website issue
The comments which have been removed are not intended to improve the village wikipedia entry but are aimed to cause disruption and extend a local grievance. Disagreements should not be brought into wikipedia. (Bwiseman (talk) 12:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC))
- Very simple: anything that is not verified will be removed. Unless your village website is some sort of significant community project, then I doubt it has been mentioned in any third party publications. If it has, then we can get on to discussing notability, which I rather feel it would fail again.
- At the moment, it is gone, vanished. There's your solution. --Breadandcheese (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think you will find that the site is a "significant community project" and does meet criteria 2 of notability for having won the Calor Scottish Community of The Year competition on several occasions. Java Jockey (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes and all of the claims with made by the various editors are verifiable by the contents of the site itself Frenum McSpleen (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
---
Please note - The Village Website is NOT a commercial site in any shape or form. No payment is received and no profit made from running or being associated with the site. (Bwiseman (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC))
--- It is about time. (Eddy Fictitious)