Talk:Lake Tarpon: Difference between revisions
stub |
m add photo/-reqphoto using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lake project|class=stub|importance=}} |
{{Lake project|class=stub|importance=}} |
||
{{WPFlorida|class=stub}} |
{{WPFlorida|class=stub}} |
||
{{reqphoto|in=Pinellas County, Florida}} |
|||
== Candidate for speedy deletion? == |
== Candidate for speedy deletion? == |
Revision as of 18:20, 28 June 2011
Lakes Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Florida Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Candidate for speedy deletion?
I don't know if I didn't cite my source correctly or what, but I clearly gave credit to the source I retrieved my information from. --Nathan Dolan 02:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep it
I vote for keeping this article. It's a short article about a lake, which is notable for its geographic significance alone. However, I think what they are looking for is some "re-wording" and "re-writing" of the material. So don't delete it, just re-write it.--Paul McDonald 02:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep
I don't see any problem with the article it seems to have a fair amount of relavance. Really not much of a argument for deletion--St.daniel 02:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Removed
I removed the nomination. Please keep in mind that the revision I nominated, the article was a word for word copy of the external link.Michael Greiner 02:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)