Jump to content

Talk:Labworth Café: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Oneblackline (talk | contribs)
Building different from bridges.
Oneblackline (talk | contribs)
m refutation & truth > contradiction & meaning.
Line 4: Line 4:
''"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs"''. No it isn't; [[Kingsgate Bridge]], for example, was designed by Arup as architect. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] ([[User talk:DWaterson|talk]]) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
''"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs"''. No it isn't; [[Kingsgate Bridge]], for example, was designed by Arup as architect. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] ([[User talk:DWaterson|talk]]) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


:The source probably means that it's the only building designed entirely by Arup. The [[Kingsgate Bridge]] may also be designed entirely by Arup, but it exists as a bridge rather than a thing generally known as a building. I suppose there's a small possibility that another building might exist, but until that time (and with respect to the clear intention but ambiguous wording from the author at images of England) I think it would be appropriate to edit the article accordingly. If another source exists which refutes the truth of the new statement then I'm more than willing to amend the article. [[User:Oneblackline|Oneblackline]] ([[User talk:Oneblackline|talk]]) 13:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
:The source probably means that it's the only building designed entirely by Arup. The [[Kingsgate Bridge]] may also be designed entirely by Arup, but it exists as a bridge rather than a thing generally known as a building. I suppose there's a small possibility that another building might exist, but until that time (and with respect to the clear intention but ambiguous wording from the author at images of England) I think it would be appropriate to edit the article accordingly. If another source exists which contradicts the meaning of the new statement then I'm more than willing to amend the article. [[User:Oneblackline|Oneblackline]] ([[User talk:Oneblackline|talk]]) 13:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:01, 16 June 2008

Dubious

"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs". No it isn't; Kingsgate Bridge, for example, was designed by Arup as architect. DWaterson (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source probably means that it's the only building designed entirely by Arup. The Kingsgate Bridge may also be designed entirely by Arup, but it exists as a bridge rather than a thing generally known as a building. I suppose there's a small possibility that another building might exist, but until that time (and with respect to the clear intention but ambiguous wording from the author at images of England) I think it would be appropriate to edit the article accordingly. If another source exists which contradicts the meaning of the new statement then I'm more than willing to amend the article. Oneblackline (talk) 13:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]