Talk:Chiltern Main Line: Difference between revisions
It is intercity. |
m Dating comment by TheOneKEA - "It is intercity." |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
This line is not an InterCity line. Yes, it links two cities, but it is the slower, secondary route between them. It is a regional secondary route and a commuter route. I have changed this. I have also changed the commuter to mention B'ham commuters as well as London. [[User:Btline|Btline]] ([[User talk:Btline|talk]]) 20:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
This line is not an InterCity line. Yes, it links two cities, but it is the slower, secondary route between them. It is a regional secondary route and a commuter route. I have changed this. I have also changed the commuter to mention B'ham commuters as well as London. [[User:Btline|Btline]] ([[User talk:Btline|talk]]) 20:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
Unfortunately, you're wrong. It is an intercity line, not an InterCity line. The line links Greater London (which is a de facto city) with the City of Birmingham, and thus qualifies as an intercity route. Howerver, it never regularly carried trains that were branded under the old BR InterCity brand; AFAICR it carried trains branded under the BR CrossCountry/Regional Railways brand. Line speeds, the presence of commuter traffic, and its (possible) classification as a secondary route by [[Network Rail]] doesn't really enter into the equation IMO. -[[User:TheOneKEA]] (20080618 18:35 GMT) |
Unfortunately, you're wrong. It is an intercity line, not an InterCity line. The line links Greater London (which is a de facto city) with the City of Birmingham, and thus qualifies as an intercity route. Howerver, it never regularly carried trains that were branded under the old BR InterCity brand; AFAICR it carried trains branded under the BR CrossCountry/Regional Railways brand. Line speeds, the presence of commuter traffic, and its (possible) classification as a secondary route by [[Network Rail]] doesn't really enter into the equation IMO. -[[User:TheOneKEA]] (20080618 18:35 GMT) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 22:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 22:38, 18 June 2008
 | Buckinghamshire (inactive) | |||
| ||||
 | Trains: in UK Start‑class Mid‑importance  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Chiltern Main Line. |
Last paragraph
Surely the last paragraph is somewhat subjective? -- 80.41.215.203 16:26, 21 Apr 2005
- I have clatrified 'rubbish trains'; I presume that is what this comment was about. The last para now reads:
- The line from Northolt Junction to Paddington alone has not been improved, and only one Chiltern train a day from Princes Risborough, and back, uses it, and only during the week. Freight trains carrying refuse from London use the line, however, and it has been used as a diversion when work is taking place on the line to Marylebone, or when the normal line into Paddington is closed.
- which seems perfectly NPOV to me. What I don't understand is the last phrase and what exactly is thw 'normal line into Paddington'?. -- Chris j wood 20:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Split article?
Should this article be split up into several new articles? The suggested new article names are below. Our Phellap 23:07, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Chiltern Main Line - just Marylebone-Birmingham Snow Hill
- London to Aylesbury Line
- Leamington to Stratford Line
- Leamington to Coventry Line
- Princes Risborough to Aylesbury Line
Oxford-Banbury spur?
The section on 'future' suggests that Oxford-Banbury could be transferred to Chiltern as a consequence of a new Oxford-Risborough line; given that XC use the line as a key part of the Reading-Birmingham route, would it not be unnecessarily confusing to move this to Chiltern? 62.239.159.6 (talk) 13:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Line Speeds and History
I just added a bunch of info on line speeds and reformatted the History section to remove the "wall of text" effect. I'd appreciate any feedback available. -User:TheOneKEA (20080530 18:33) —Preceding comment was added at 22:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, the speed info is good. Too good perhaps. Maybe just a more simple bullet point list would be ok (see the B'ham to Worcester via Kidderminster line page). Btline (talk) 16:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Not Intercity
This line is not an InterCity line. Yes, it links two cities, but it is the slower, secondary route between them. It is a regional secondary route and a commuter route. I have changed this. I have also changed the commuter to mention B'ham commuters as well as London. Btline (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, you're wrong. It is an intercity line, not an InterCity line. The line links Greater London (which is a de facto city) with the City of Birmingham, and thus qualifies as an intercity route. Howerver, it never regularly carried trains that were branded under the old BR InterCity brand; AFAICR it carried trains branded under the BR CrossCountry/Regional Railways brand. Line speeds, the presence of commuter traffic, and its (possible) classification as a secondary route by Network Rail doesn't really enter into the equation IMO. -User:TheOneKEA (20080618 18:35 GMT) —Preceding comment was added at 22:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)