Jump to content

User talk:SYSS Mouse/Archive 01: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dfgarcia (talk | contribs)
Feets: new section
Line 313: Line 313:


Thank you for your input on the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taser controversy|recent AFD]] on [[Taser controversy]]. The editors involved with that article would like to continue the discussion on how to proceed and invite you to join the discussion at [[Talk:Taser controversy]]. The latest discussions include [[Talk:Taser controversy#re:Globalise]] and [[Talk:Taser controversy#Renaming this article?]]. [[User:Flatscan|Flatscan]] ([[User talk:Flatscan|talk]]) 02:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your input on the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taser controversy|recent AFD]] on [[Taser controversy]]. The editors involved with that article would like to continue the discussion on how to proceed and invite you to join the discussion at [[Talk:Taser controversy]]. The latest discussions include [[Talk:Taser controversy#re:Globalise]] and [[Talk:Taser controversy#Renaming this article?]]. [[User:Flatscan|Flatscan]] ([[User talk:Flatscan|talk]]) 02:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

== Feets ==

Whoops. Thanks for the clarification. [[User:Dfgarcia|dfg]] ([[User talk:Dfgarcia|talk]]) 20:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:37, 18 July 2008

Hello SYSS Mouse/Archive 01 and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Bemani

Hi, could you take a look at Category talk:Bemani? I'm proposing some changes, and since you're one of the best contributors to Bemani articles I believe your opinion would really matter there. --Kamek 19:59, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

mathNEWS

Re: Request for Wiki assistance.

Funny, I used to contribute to SciNotes. I've never setup a wiki before; I've only contributed to this one. So I wouldn't have any idea of how to set one up. I would indeed like to know since I would like to set one up for myself, but I haven't had the time to sit down and figure it out. TimothyPilgrim 02:27, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)

Bemani

I hate to say that your edit is not a good edit at all, the category Bemani artists is for composers who contributed music to the Bemani games. This article also serves as a general introduction for the category of Bemani games.

The category links are prposefully placed there.

I am reverting the edits. SYSS Mouse 22:07, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I really don't know anything about Bemani, except what I read here on Wikipedia. It is not common practice to use links to categories inside the articles and this is the reason for my edit. Revert if you want. However, Bemani should be categorised in some way and I think this article is well inside the scope of Category:Bemani video games. _R_ 23:08, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

mathNEWS

Actually, when I made that change, I was just looking at the syntax... figured you knew what you were doing by italicizing it. Looking at the mathNEWS website, they seem to be doing it with the italics, but as mathNEWS rather then mathNEWS. We might want to switch it to that, for consistancy's sake, if nothing more. Arcuras 04:37, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

Considering the contents it has so far, I don't think it's worth an article. The only point in favor of it IMO is the fact of it being the #1 Google hit (which proves it is a fairly big website, thus possibly deserving an article... if there's something to write about it). --Kamek 04:41, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

I doubt it neither. What I think is that it WILL NEVER become articcle-worthy. #1 Google does not mean anything. Maybe a subsection in DDR mentioning the effect of DDR Freak in the popularity. But that's it. SYSS Mouse 04:53, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Uncharted Waters

I have actually only played New Horizons (UW2) in English, so much of it came from the web. If you know more about the series you can help refine the details. Dates I got from GameFAQs so should be fairly accurate. --Euniana 03:14, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The DDR phenomenon

Replied to your comment in Talk:Dance Dance Revolution#The DDR phenomenon. --Poiuytman 10:14, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I cleaned up the links, as per your request. I then decided to clean up some of the inconsistencies in tense and grammatical person, then capitalization and quoting, date inaccuracies, the huge amount of redundancy in the "Variations" section....I sort of lost track of time and ended up re-writing a good deal of the article. :P
--Poiuytman 14:40, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Xfire

Hi SYSS Mouse -- Took a look at your rewrite of Xfire, & you made it closer to what I consider a Wikipedia article should look like, although I made a few copy edits. Thanks for the quick work on fixing this! -- llywrch 16:47, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Re: user name redirect

Yeah, I made the redirect page in anticipation of my username being changed, but it doesn't seem that the username change page is ever maintained anymore. I guess I'll get rid of the redirects. Thanks. --Poiuyt Man (talk) 20:45, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your support on WP:RFA. – ABCD 02:28, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Alright, I don't really know anything about her, but I recognized the other names like Cao Cao, and she seemed to be a real person from a quick Google search. I didn't think it was worthy of being speedily deleted, but if you think it needs to be listed on VFD, then I support that. Adam Bishop 03:09, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: DDR again

I think the DDR article has the potential for featured article status in the near future, but there are several problem areas. "Songs and levels" needs some cleanup, and "The DDR phenomenon" needs serious work. --Poiuyt Man (talk) 05:29, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: Happy Corner

I have cleaned up a little bit. Will be back some time when I'm free. — Instantnood 23:45, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Happy Corner illustration

I've drawn one illustration of your article. Hope you don't mind. =) P.S. Some minor clean-ups are made at the same time. Please check.

Re: several things

I agree to your stance. Actually I searched that piece of information from the Internet, and, without in-depth contemplation, re-wrote the concerned phrases into the article. The misleading contents were cleaned up. Thanks for your adivce. =)

Another thing is about the copyrigt tag about Happy Corner. I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm all at sea about those bits and bobs of tagging. Up to now, I don't have the foggiest idea about what kind of tab code should be implemented. So if you have a recommendation, please kindly inform me as soon as possible.

PS I'm a native Chinese, but I'd like to write in English--just because typing Chinese is beyong my ken! Have a nice day.

PPS If you want any articles to be translated (into English of course), or demand further proof-reading processes, please feel free to contact me at any time.--Mcy jerry 08:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support. Tony the Marine


About anonymous users

Hey Kenny,

Can you force someone to sign up to a Wikipedia account? Because the same person with a dynamic IP keeps making (poor, POV) edits and it's a hassle to track all his work down... --Madchester 04:58, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

Hello! I've noticed your past interest in Wikipedia:Mind Benders and wanted to share the following announcement with you! I've taken over the responsibilities of Mind Benders, and the page will now be regularly updated. Right now, the pre-round is open (it's more of a creative artistic competition), and round one will open soon (the questions are done, we just need to wait for the pre-round to begin/finish)! So why not check it out? I'll keep you updated! Thanks, Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 01:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to pass this news on to other Wikipedians.

ArbCom case

Thanks for keeping an eye on the ArbCom case. :-) In case it is really (re)open, please free feel to comment, no matter for or against my position, or anybody else's, by writing a statement. — Instantnood 18:25, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Admin vote

Thank you for your neutral vote? I don't even know how I earned a nom for adminship... I was just doing my own thing and someone noticed my work. :-P --Madchester 16:09, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Umm, thank you for your note and picking up my assignments? I just didn'r stay till the end of class. Did the prof mention any other bonus questions, besides the Home Depot ROE one? -Madchester 16:14, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

Super Eurobeat

Go right ahead, the only reason I reverted was that it was as you said poorly written. I see no problem in you working on it. Havok (T/C) 09:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chinese Bible versions

幸會!有關中文聖經的文章,多謝你做中文維基的連結。(我本來只是想寫一點我知道的東西,然後就「走火入魔」了。)我看過了中文維基的版本,我想如果將中英文維基的兩個版本整合一下會比較好。請多多指教!

註:我住北約克。我見你的討論頁有提及MathNews,是否UW學生?十幾年前我也是UW學生。——Gniw (Wing) 06:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SuperNova

I suppose you're right :-) It's a good idea to leave it off until official word is given, but check out my contrib to the talk page... I do think it's sanctioned by Konami since they're using the DDR trademark, they just haven't released official word. But we'll see :-) - Lightdarkness 04:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 04:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Miller

Hi, SYSS. There's been some discussion about your move on this talk page: Talk:Robin Miller (nurse). We're thinking that since the other Robin Miller is easily distinguished from this one by "Sir," it'd be better to move the Robin Miller (nurse) page back to Robin Miller, and move your new disambiguation page to Robin Miller (disambiguation). If you approve or disapprove or have some other input, please let us know at Talk:Robin Miller (nurse). Thanks! —Cleared as filed. 14:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mets501 talk page

I just wanted to say thank you for reverting some nasty vandalism on my User_talk:Mets501 page. --Mets501talk 03:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10A section of HKCEE

The 10A section is encyclopedic, because it serves as a hall of fame. Most articles concerning awards, for example, Bauhinia Bowl, has them. I'm adding them back. --Deryck C. 07:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DDR Characters article

How come you want to delete the DDR characters article? I'll listen to your reasons.

Could you please take another look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Browning (Texas politician)? I fixed the article James Browning (Texas politician) by replacing the hoax text with information from a number of sources on the real Texas politician by this name. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You added a casualty total of ~100 for the British and allies in this war. I cannot find a source for this claim. Do you know where the number comes from? Rmhermen 02:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia WhatPulse Team

Hi! I noticed that you used WhatPulse. I invite you to annexation to us Wikimedan team! Please look there for details: Wikimedia WhatPulse Team. --Krzysiu Jarzyna 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By removing those links, I meant that I removed the "Spam" indicator. It was unacceptable, as, this is a commercial product, it isn't considered spam to have a link to the product it is describing, or other branches of this product. --SwitchSpectre 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: financial audit at signpost

Thanks for letting me know! We always encourage people to improve our articles and fix any errors they may have, and I'm glad you clarified things with your edits. Thanks again for the heads up. Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/SYSS Mouse/Archive 01, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Why did you make the following edit? - Ta bu shi da yu 17:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I rather think that was a typo, however. - Ta bu shi da yu 18:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Records

You forgot to put a notice in the article on being fully protected. ("You Suck!!!") :P SYSS Mouse 21:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a padlock on it now...




YOU SUCK!



hehe  ALKIVAR 23:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black history biographies

Good job! I forgot I made that list... — BRIAN0918 • 2007-03-20 18:10Z

AfD nomination of MathNEWS

An article that you have been involved in editing, MathNEWS, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MathNEWS. Thank you. GreenJoe 18:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

here and gone

You made an AFD nomination of an article with a long hexadecimal title per [[1]], and it was there and then it disappeared, along with the article. Quick work. Edison 02:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at the AFD and about to go to the article when the darned thing disappeared. But I googled the long hexadecimal number and now I see why some administrator with oversight powers took it upon himself to make it vanish. I just wish they would leave an explanation in the AFD discussion page when they do it. Edison 02:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If someone is experienced enough and trusted enough to be granted oversight power to make anything disappear from Wikipedia and from the edit history, they could also be expected to drop a note to the person who nominated the article for deletion. I don't know about deletion review, but you could do that and see if there is an explanation of the way the oversight deletion was done without a note to you, regardless of however appropriate the oversight may have been. Edison 03:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Digg website dealt differently with the posting of the accursed evil secret number: [2] Edison 15:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HD Key

I'd just like to say thanks for bring up a Deletion Review - I was planning to but couldn't figure it out. --142.68.40.44 03:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion

I'm aware of the deletion review. Is there anything in particular about it that's worth mentioning, beyond it being one of the multiplicity of places on Wikipedia where the key was discussed? I haven't listed many of the others, and I'm not sure how much value it would add to the story. Maybe a comprehensive list could be compiled on the story's talk page if people want. --Michael Snow 16:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this technical correction. I was not aware of that unique template. Smee 02:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Be more careful with reverts

It seems you chose to revert the Kevin Trudeau article back to an earlier version. However, it seems that you reverted it so far back that you actually reinserted all the vandalism that the same user went back and removed. Please pay more attention when reverting articles in the future. TheDevilYouKnow 19:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop trying to out another editor, or you may be blocked. See WP:HARASS, especially here. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 00:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agawa Canyon

Hello. In regards to the {{advertisement}} tag you added to Agawa Canyon, is there a specific issue or problematic section in the article? As it was the first article I ever created on Wikipedia, it certainly may not be my best work, however if you could point me in the direction of what specifically needs to be fixed, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Seeing as you performed a Non-Admin closure, be sure to edit the discussion and add the Admin's name and rationale as seen in the article's log page. It's required by Wikipedia:Deletion process. Thanks! - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 15:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:FAAAstrobadge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FAAAstrobadge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there.

I just wanted to know if you're able to take a picture of the Coptic Orthodox Church Center in Mississauga OR St. Mark's Coptic Orthodox Church in Toronto. You can find out the street address online (the links to those websites are on the image pages). The current images are, unfortunately, copyrighted, as I was the one who uploaded them.

The current (copyrighted) images may get deleted, so if they do, then I'll need to replace them.

I need you or somebody else to take a picture, release its copyright, and upload it onto Wikipedia. I HAVE contacted others to notify them also, so if there are more than one pictures, that's OK (I can still make an article on them). I want these images to be used for, specifically, the article "Coptic Orthodox Church in Canada". The image pages are, again:

Anyway, thank - you very much! Some people have NO idea how hard it is to get some images to give articles a little life. I was one of them. ~ Troy 22:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I think you must be referring to this edit to the legal page? If so, and you think there's other areas that need attention, can you clarify a bit? I'm afraid I wasn't 100% clear from your note exactly what you were after.

Also might be wise to discuss on that talk page, where others can comment too.

Thanks anyhow! :)

FT2 (Talk | email) 16:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of wonders in Civilization

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of wonders in Civilization, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of wonders in Civilization. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of wonders in Civilization, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of wonders in Civilization satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wonders in Civilization and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of wonders in Civilization during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 16:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The scan of the Senate resolution

Hi SYSS Mouse, Thank you for the kind words.

I don't really know about the Resolution, but I don't think there is a copyright infringement since the document was turned over to me, as stated within the resolution and therefore became my property. I in turn am giving permission to Wikipedia to use it. In any case I could ask the President of the Senate to give me permission to use it but, it would seem sort of funny since the document is mine, don't you think. I could assume all of the responsibility for it's use. Take care Tony the Marine 20:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • SYSS Mouse, I am the owner of the original, sealed all and not the of a copy, so there isn't any copyright infringement. The uploaded copy is of the original. Since Puerto Rico is a territory of the United States, I believe that it's documents are public and also fall under the free documentations which United States documents fall under. However, since as stated I own the original I assume full responsiblity. I just want to share this accomplishemnt with the community, since I believe that it my be the first time that one of its own has been honored by the government. Tony the Marine 20:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

SYSS Mouse, you did a good job finding a link to my resolution (something that I was unable to do), that I was wondering if you could help me find a link for the following:

On May 9, 1991, the Hon. James H. Scheuer of the United States House of Representatives paid tribute to Capt. Manuel Rivera.

Any help here will be greatly appreciated. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've warned the user in fairly strong terms; they appear to have stopped editing for the moment, but I'll keep an eye out. Thanks for the heads up on that second AfD. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Beer Blow

I do not see how this page could be tagged. It is not about any real person and therefore does not meet the criteria under which it is flagged. It has reference to an external source, and regardless of any opinion about the significance of drinking games, there are many Wikipedia articles dealing with exactly that subject matter. I request that you remove the flag immediately.

AfD nomination of Beer Blow

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beer Blow, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer Blow. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Accounting4Taste:talk 21:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's still an inappropriate title for an encyclopedia article, although it may be appropriate for a redirect. But whatever. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Gardner

Hi, I've replied to your message on my talk page. Kevin (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taser controversy AfD

Thank you for your input on the recent AFD on Taser controversy. The editors involved with that article would like to continue the discussion on how to proceed and invite you to join the discussion at Talk:Taser controversy. The latest discussions include Talk:Taser controversy#re:Globalise and Talk:Taser controversy#Renaming this article?. Flatscan (talk) 02:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feets

Whoops. Thanks for the clarification. dfg (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]