Jump to content

Paley construction: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wikilink: character
more detail and examples
Line 22: Line 22:
The Jacobsthal matrix has the properties ''QQ''<sup>T</sup> = ''qI''−''J'' and ''QJ'' = ''JQ'' = 0 where ''I'' is the ''q''×''q'' identity matrix and ''J'' is the ''q''×''q'' all-1 matrix. If ''q'' is congruent to 1 (mod 4) then −1 is a square in ''GF''(''q'')
The Jacobsthal matrix has the properties ''QQ''<sup>T</sup> = ''qI''−''J'' and ''QJ'' = ''JQ'' = 0 where ''I'' is the ''q''×''q'' identity matrix and ''J'' is the ''q''×''q'' all-1 matrix. If ''q'' is congruent to 1 (mod 4) then −1 is a square in ''GF''(''q'')
which implies that ''Q'' is a [[symmetric matrix]]. If ''q'' is congruent to 3 (mod 4) then −1 is not a square, and ''Q'' is a
which implies that ''Q'' is a [[symmetric matrix]]. If ''q'' is congruent to 3 (mod 4) then −1 is not a square, and ''Q'' is a
[[skew-symmetric matrix]]. When ''q'' is a prime number, ''Q'' is a circulant matrix. That is, each row is obtained from the row above by cyclic permutation.
[[skew-symmetric matrix]].


==Paley construction I==
==Paley construction I==
Line 33: Line 33:
-j & Q\end{bmatrix}
-j & Q\end{bmatrix}
</math>
</math>
is a Hadamard matrix of size ''q''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1. Here ''j'' is the all-1 column vector of length ''q'' and ''I'' is the (''q''+1)×(''q''+1) identity matrix.
is a Hadamard matrix of size ''q''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1. Here ''j'' is the all-1 column vector of length ''q'' and ''I'' is the (''q''+1)×(''q''+1) identity matrix. The matrix ''H'' is a skew Hadamard matrix, which means it satisfies ''H''+''H''<sup>T</sup>=2''I''.


==Paley construction II==
==Paley construction II==
Line 61: Line 61:
</math>
</math>


is a Hadamard matrix of size 2(''q''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1).
is a Hadamard matrix of size 2(''q''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1). It is a symmetric Hadamard matrix.

==Examples==

Applying Paley Construction I to the Jacobsthal matrix for ''GF''(7), one produces the 8×8 Hadamard matrix,

<pre>
11111111
-1--1-11
-11--1-1
-111--1-
--111--1
-1-111--
--1-111-
---1-111.
</pre>

For an example of the Paley II construction when ''q'' is a prime power rather than a prime number, consider ''GF''(9). This is an extension field of ''GF''(3) obtained
by adjoining a root of an irreducible quadratic. Different irreducible quadratics produce equivalent fields. Choosing ''x''<sup>2</sup>+''x''−1 and letting ''a'' be a root of this polynomial, the nine element of ''GF''(9) may be written 0, 1, −1, ''a'', ''a''+1, ''a''−1, −''a'', −''a''+1, −''a''−1. The non-zero squares are (±1)<sup>2</sup>=1, (±''a'')<sup>2</sup>=−''a''+1, (±(''a''+1))<sup>2</sup>=''a''−1, and (±(''a''−1))<sup>2</sup>=−1. The Jacobsthal matrix is

:<math>
Q = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & -1\\
1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & 1\\
1 & 1 & 0 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & -1\\
-1 & 1 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 1\\
-1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & -1 & -1\\
1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & -1 & 1 & -1\\
-1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 1\\
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1\\
-1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0\end{bmatrix}.
</math>

It is a symmetric matrix consisting of nine 3×3 circulant blocks. Paley Construction II produces the symmetric 20×20 Hadamard matrix,

<pre>
1- 111111 111111 111111
-- 1-1-1- 1-1-1- 1-1-1-

11 1-1111 ----11 --11--
1- --1-1- -1-11- -11--1
11 111-11 11---- ----11
1- 1---1- 1--1-1 -1-11-
11 11111- --11-- 11----
1- 1-1--- -11--1 1--1-1

11 --11-- 1-1111 ----11
1- -11--1 --1-1- -1-11-
11 ----11 111-11 11----
1- -1-11- 1---1- 1--1-1
11 11---- 11111- --11--
1- 1--1-1 1-1--- -11--1

11 ----11 --11-- 1-1111
1- -1-11- -11--1 --1-1-
11 11---- ----11 111-11
1- 1--1-1 -1-11- 1---1-
11 --11-- 11---- 11111-
1- -11--1 1--1-1 1-1---.
</pre>



==The Hadamard conjecture==
==The Hadamard conjecture==
Line 73: Line 133:
</math>
</math>


Hadamard matrices of every allowed size up to 100 except for 92 are produced. This led Paley to conjecture that Hadamard matrices exist for every size which is a multiple of 4. A matrix of size 92 was eventually constructed by Baumert, [[Solomon W. Golomb|Golomb]], and [[Marshall Hall (mathematician)|Hall]], using a construction due to Williamson combined with a computer search. Currently, Hadamard matrices have been shown to exist for all <math>\scriptstyle m \,\equiv\, 0 \mod 4</math> for ''m''&nbsp;<&nbsp;668.
Hadamard matrices of every allowed size up to 100 except for 92 are produced. In his 1933 paper, Paley says “It seems probable that, whenever ''m'' is divisible by 4, it is possible to construct an orthogonal matrix of order ''m'' composed of ±1, but the general theorem has every appearance of difficulty.” This appears to be the first published statement of the Hadamard conjecture. A matrix of size 92 was eventually constructed by Baumert, [[Solomon W. Golomb|Golomb]], and [[Marshall Hall (mathematician)|Hall]], using a construction due to Williamson combined with a computer search. Currently, Hadamard matrices have been shown to exist for all <math>\scriptstyle m \,\equiv\, 0 \mod 4</math> for ''m''&nbsp;<&nbsp;668.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 02:48, 20 July 2008

In mathematics, the Paley construction is a method for constructing Hadamard matrices using finite fields. The construction was described in 1933 by the English mathematician Raymond Paley.

The Paley construction uses quadratic residues in a finite field GF(q) where q is a power of an odd prime number. There are two versions of the construction depending on whether q is congruent to 1 or 3 (mod 4).

Quadratic character and Jacobsthal matrix

The quadratic character χ(a) indicates whether the given finite field element a is a perfect square or not. Specifically, χ(0)=0, χ(a) = 1 if a=b2 for some non-zero finite field element b, and χ(a) = −1 if a is not the square of any finite field element. For example, in GF(7) the non-zero squares are 12 = 62 = 1, 22 = 52 = 4, and 32 = 42 = 2. Hence χ(0) = 0, χ(1) = χ(2) = χ(4) = 1, and χ(3) = χ(5) = χ(6) = −1.

The Jacobsthal matrix Q for GF(q) is the q×q matrix with rows and columns indexed by finite field elements such that the entry in row a and column b is χ(ab). For example, in GF(7), if the rows and columns of the Jacobsthal matrix are indexed by the field elements 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, then

The Jacobsthal matrix has the properties QQT = qIJ and QJ = JQ = 0 where I is the q×q identity matrix and J is the q×q all-1 matrix. If q is congruent to 1 (mod 4) then −1 is a square in GF(q) which implies that Q is a symmetric matrix. If q is congruent to 3 (mod 4) then −1 is not a square, and Q is a skew-symmetric matrix. When q is a prime number, Q is a circulant matrix. That is, each row is obtained from the row above by cyclic permutation.

Paley construction I

If q is congruent to 3 (mod 4) then

is a Hadamard matrix of size q + 1. Here j is the all-1 column vector of length q and I is the (q+1)×(q+1) identity matrix. The matrix H is a skew Hadamard matrix, which means it satisfies H+HT=2I.

Paley construction II

If q is congruent to 1 (mod 4) then the matrix obtained by replacing all 0 entries in

with the matrix

and all entries ±1 with the matrix

is a Hadamard matrix of size 2(q + 1). It is a symmetric Hadamard matrix.

Examples

Applying Paley Construction I to the Jacobsthal matrix for GF(7), one produces the 8×8 Hadamard matrix,

11111111
-1--1-11
-11--1-1
-111--1-
--111--1
-1-111--
--1-111-
---1-111.

For an example of the Paley II construction when q is a prime power rather than a prime number, consider GF(9). This is an extension field of GF(3) obtained by adjoining a root of an irreducible quadratic. Different irreducible quadratics produce equivalent fields. Choosing x2+x−1 and letting a be a root of this polynomial, the nine element of GF(9) may be written 0, 1, −1, a, a+1, a−1, −a, −a+1, −a−1. The non-zero squares are (±1)2=1, (±a)2=−a+1, (±(a+1))2=a−1, and (±(a−1))2=−1. The Jacobsthal matrix is

It is a symmetric matrix consisting of nine 3×3 circulant blocks. Paley Construction II produces the symmetric 20×20 Hadamard matrix,

1- 111111 111111 111111
-- 1-1-1- 1-1-1- 1-1-1-

11 1-1111 ----11 --11--
1- --1-1- -1-11- -11--1
11 111-11 11---- ----11
1- 1---1- 1--1-1 -1-11-
11 11111- --11-- 11----
1- 1-1--- -11--1 1--1-1

11 --11-- 1-1111 ----11
1- -11--1 --1-1- -1-11-
11 ----11 111-11 11----
1- -1-11- 1---1- 1--1-1
11 11---- 11111- --11--
1- 1--1-1 1-1--- -11--1

11 ----11 --11-- 1-1111
1- -1-11- -11--1 --1-1-
11 11---- ----11 111-11
1- 1--1-1 -1-11- 1---1-
11 --11-- 11---- 11111-
1- -11--1 1--1-1 1-1---.


The Hadamard conjecture

The size of a Hadamard matrix must be 1, 2, or a multiple of 4. The tensor product of two Hadamard matrices of sizes m and n is an Hadamard matrix of size mn. By forming tensor products of matrices from the Paley construction and the 2×2 matrix,

Hadamard matrices of every allowed size up to 100 except for 92 are produced. In his 1933 paper, Paley says “It seems probable that, whenever m is divisible by 4, it is possible to construct an orthogonal matrix of order m composed of ±1, but the general theorem has every appearance of difficulty.” This appears to be the first published statement of the Hadamard conjecture. A matrix of size 92 was eventually constructed by Baumert, Golomb, and Hall, using a construction due to Williamson combined with a computer search. Currently, Hadamard matrices have been shown to exist for all for m < 668.

References

  • Paley, R.E.A.C. (1933). "On orthogonal matrices". J. Math. Phys. 12: 311–320.
  • L. D. Baumert, S. W. Golomb, M. Hall Jr., Discovery of an Hadamard matrix of order 92, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1962) 237–238.