User talk:FrankTownend

Hi, I tracked down your unsigned message to this page

I think the article was actually title backwater fever, but in any case, wikipedia is an encyclopedia - you should put simple definitions into wikitionary.

If I can be of help in future, let me know - and welcome to Wikipedia jimfbleak 04:11, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for backing me up in the discussion on copyright at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barrington_Hall I appreciate it. --Natezomby 18:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Operation Dipscam article

→ Copies of posts to Talk:Operation Dipscam crossposted here. 04:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

• A cleanup tag was added to the article today. FrankTownend, you initiated this article last month with a press release: if you care about its future, it would be a good idea to start making it encyclopedic. –Æ. ✉ 21:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• UPDATE: The article has been tagged for speedy deletion (see notice at top of article page) - now is the time to add {{hangon}} to it & get to work to make it worth keeping! –Æ. ✉ 04:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

It is about time...

Sir, you have been on this account since 6 August 2004, isn't it about time you stopped doing things half-assed and did them right? You don't add links after categories like you did today. Get off you lazy butt and go read the Help:Contents, Wikipedia:Manual of Style, Wikipedia:Layout, Wikipedia:External links, etc. Learn how to do things right or don't do them at all. You get a lazy-pussy "F" for today's addition. Instead of just adding a link, try to work what is relevent into the body of the article and use the link as a reference, not an "External link". Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. Quality in = quality out. Crap in, well you know. Pretend when adding information that you are submitting it to the editors at Encyclopedia Americana. 207.69.139.141 (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not amused with those who talk shit while they hide behind an IP address... FrankTownend (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Frank, the link you keep posted to Young Men and Fire does not work. Can you check the link to make sure it is accurate? Thanks --Daysleeper47 (talk) 17:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

it is also incorrectly formatted, and not really relevant in that context. Best O Fortuna (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)