User talk:Nonymous-raz

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Policy Library

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re, social psychology

Please do not make comments on the page itself. Make them in the comments section.

Your concern re: Erikson "(note to writer-- this is Freudian Psychosexual Development NOT ERIK ERIKSON's 8 STEP SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT)" was misplaced. This item is a different contribution of Erikson's. It is not the 8 step model.

Thanks Lucidish 04:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No, thank you sir Nonymous-raz

Harlow

You inserted the passage on Harry Harlow which claims his most well known experiment was fraudulent. Using google as well as several current textbooks I can find no corroboration for this claim. At any rate, please provide a reference. -- markus n 03:24, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

eggspection

Don't worry! If you read the prod tag you'll see that the article will only be deleted after 5 days, so you have plenty of time to add more information. I highly recommend reading WP:CORP first, which gives criteria for companies to be listed on Wikipedia. If the article doesn't meet the standards in WP:CORP, it will probably end up getting deleted anyway, so you will have wasted your time. If that business can meet WP:CORP and you have added that information, you're perfectly free to remove the pro tag. If you have any other questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Natalie 20:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

PS I am not an admin, so I can't delete pages. There are three kinds of deletions on Wikipedia: speedy, proposed, and nominated. Speedy deletions (WP:SPEEDY) are pages that meet a very specific criteria and should be gotten rid of ASAP. Nominations for deletions (WP:AFD) are articles for which there needs to be consensus about whether or not the page belongs on Wikipedia. Proposals for deletion (WP:PROD - which is what I put of eggspection) fall somewhere in between. Natalie 20:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quasipresence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quasipresence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 14:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Justification for terrorism

I have nominated Justification for terrorism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justification for terrorism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail Review} 20:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)