User talk:GJR: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left]]I have nominated [[Melville Davisson Post]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melville Davisson Post]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Shapiros10|<font color="blue">'''Sam'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shapiros10|<font color="red">'''Blab'''</font>]]</sup> 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> [[User:Shapiros10|<font color="blue">'''Sam'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shapiros10|<font color="red">'''Blab'''</font>]]</sup> 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left]]I have nominated [[Melville Davisson Post]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melville Davisson Post]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Shapiros10|<font color="blue">'''Sam'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shapiros10|<font color="red">'''Blab'''</font>]]</sup> 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> [[User:Shapiros10|<font color="blue">'''Sam'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shapiros10|<font color="red">'''Blab'''</font>]]</sup> 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
::i fail to understand why the [[Melville Davisson Post]] article is a candidate for deletion? it is factual, the author has a place in the evolution of the mystery/crime novel, and his vital statistics have been documented. A bibliography is included, and might i suggest you google "Melville Davisson Post" and you will find that he is (a) far from obscure and (b) still in print, and hence still germane. what was/is your criteria for recommending "speedy deletion"? |
::i fail to understand why the [[Melville Davisson Post]] article is a candidate for deletion? it is factual, the author has a place in the evolution of the mystery/crime novel, and his vital statistics have been documented. A bibliography is included, and might i suggest you google "Melville Davisson Post" and you will find that he is (a) far from obscure and (b) still in print, and hence still germane. what was/is your criteria for recommending "speedy deletion"? [[User:GJR|oedipus]] ([[User talk:GJR#top|talk]]) 23:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:24, 5 October 2008
Language tags
Hello,
would you mind explaining your additions of language tags, such as the one you performed at Luis de Narváez? They don't seem to do anything to the text, yet the size of the article increases dramatically, which is not good. Also, concerning the same article, why did you replace [[villancico]]s with [[villancico|villancicos]]? The link remains the same, but again, this increases the size of the article. I don't remember any MoS (or other) guidelines for these things.. --Jashiin (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- aloha! the reason i have added natural language tags is that i am blind and access the web via audio output (voice synthesis) alone; many, if not most, screen readers provide some support for natural language switching, so that the name, placename, title of a work, etc. is pronounced correctly if the user has a screen reader that supports natural language switching... for those interacting with the page visually -- especially those using high levels of screen magnifier|screen magnification, provided by a dedicated screen magnifier program -- by providing a hook to provide a glyph/character set switch; likewise, natural language tags can be used to control the output of a refreshable braille display, as there are different conventions for each natural language represented as braille, all of which are valuable aids to blind or visually impaired students, professionals, and the merely curious, which i argue is well worth the increase in the size of the article -- compared to a graphic, the addition of marking natural language switching is quite trivial... also, i replaced [[villancico]]s with [[villancico|villancicos]], because the "s" that makes it plural will not be properly pronounced if it is outside of the hyperlink text (e.g. the user hears "villancio link s", which quickly becomes quite annoying to those processing the page aurally... if there are no MoS (or other) guidelines for such considerations, then there needs to be a section about accessibility, interoperability and internationalization. -- GJR (talk) 05:37 UTC, 2008-09-26
- See my message to Jashiin about the edit. I'm blind, and also use a screen reader, JAWS. Which one do you use? See the guidelines about accessibility at Wikipedia:Accessibility: they prescribe the use of Template:Lang to indicate languages. I wouldn't have used them as much as you did, but I dislike sudden voice changes so I suppose it's a personal preference. About the link lengthening, I have only encountered this problem with links with apostrophe's in them like "[[John]]'s car." In fact, MediaWiki automatically converts links like "[[jog]]ging" to display as "[[jog|jogging]]". Hope this helps, Graham87 08:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- aloha, graham! thank you for the pointers and advice... depending upon the machine i am using at the time, i use JAWS, NVDA, Orca, SpeakUp, and emacspeak. natural language switching may not be condoned by the Wikipedia:Accessibility guidelines, but they are most definitely condoned and encouraged by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, promulgated by the W3C to which i have contributed. my basic position on the matter is: if one wants natural language switching, one needs the natural language tags in the source code; if one does not want automatic natural language switching on the fly, one can always disable that feature, but one can never obtain natural language switching on the fly without programmatic hooks to provide a signal to the user's assistive technology. natural language switching is much less disconcerting to my ears than words mispronounced due to the mis-application of english pronunciation rules, but that oly highlights the point that "accessibility" lies in the ear, eye, fingertip, or whatever is available to an individual user. however, one cannot offer a choice, if the underlying markup is not allowed. oedipus (talk) 19:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Its just that the issue is kind of important. See, for example, the featured article currently on the main page: Verdeja. It has plenty of Spanish names, yet no tags whatsoever. Or take a look at our latest featured articles (or most of our featured articles, for that matter) such as Literature in the Hoysala Empire or 2002 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake that abound in foreign words, yet contain no language tags. If this kind of markup is that important for people who use screen readers and is even listed at the WCAG, then perhaps it should be suggested (at the Village Pump, if I am not mistaken? Or at Wikipedia talk:Accessibility?) that all articles currently on the English Wikipedia be reformatted with every foreign word in appropriate tags, and the markup made a more serious guideline (because as it stands, Template:Lang seems to be mostly used for pronunciations). --Jashiin (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Also English has its own pronunciations for foreign names, like Dante Alighieri, which are important as well, so often a speech synthesizer pronouncing a foreign word as if it were English is appropriate. When borrowing loanwords, most languages change the pronunciation to suit the language's phonology. Graham87 06:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- i very much agree that this is a serious issue, and earnestly would like to provide positive and constructive advice:
An Argument for a Consistent & Realistic @lang
policy for Wikimedia
- When there are English pronunciations of placenames or proper names, then the English version of that word or placename should be used:
- for example, the word "France" would not be spanned by a
lang="fr"
declaration, because in English, "France" is pronounced differently than it is in French; - if, however, one is referring to an historical personage, such as Alfonso el Sabio, then such an instance of a name which has been incorporated into English usage in its original non-English form, SHOULD be marked as lang="es"; Likewise, whenever a placename has an English equivalent (Vienna for Wein) it is, of course, most appropriate to use the English equivalent in an article whose base natural language is English.
- for example, the word "France" would not be spanned by a
- if there is a word or idiom absorbed into English intact from its language of origin, such as strum und drang, sang froid, realpolitik, zeigeist, gestalt -- any such instance SHOULD be not only marked as belonging to a different natural language than the base natural language declared for the page, but SHOULD also be glossed with the
title
attribute, because:- not all capable of reading/understanding English will be congnizant of may foreign terms' meanings; and
- English is not the primary, secondary or tertiary language of a large numbers of users of thte English version of wikipedia;
- Use of Latinisms, such as e.g.; i.e.; ca.; fl.; etc. should NOT be marked as Latin, but SHOULD be annotated using the ABBR element of HTML4x/XHTML1
- for example:
<abbr title="and so on">etc.</abbr>
;for example
- for example:
- a word comprised of non-latinate glyphs should either be:
- marked up using unicode (makes
lang
declarations redundant); or - if entered directly as non-latinate glyphs, then the word should be marked up using the
lang="xx"
convention
- marked up using unicode (makes
remember, natural language declarations not only assist those using speech output, but those using high levels of magnification and refreshable braille displays
oedipus (talk) 20:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've copied this message to Wikipedia talk:Accessibility for further feedback. I'll have to think about this: I haven't researched all the issues involved yet. Graham87 05:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've provided a bit more feedback there, where the discussion will probably continue. Wikipedia editors don't like using HTML tags directly - instead they use them in templates like the language templates. There should be discussion on how to adapt these templates for better accessibility. Also, any comments you have about the current accessibility guidelines, or any new accessibility guidelines you can think of, would be welcomed. Graham87 06:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Melville Davisson Post
A tag has been placed on Melville Davisson Post requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sam Blab 22:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Melville Davisson Post
I have nominated Melville Davisson Post, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melville Davisson Post. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sam Blab 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Sam Blab 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- i fail to understand why the Melville Davisson Post article is a candidate for deletion? it is factual, the author has a place in the evolution of the mystery/crime novel, and his vital statistics have been documented. A bibliography is included, and might i suggest you google "Melville Davisson Post" and you will find that he is (a) far from obscure and (b) still in print, and hence still germane. what was/is your criteria for recommending "speedy deletion"? oedipus (talk) 23:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)