Talk:Wilderness therapy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:33, 2 May 2009

Medicine C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highly Biased Article

This article does NOT reflect the current thinking in the field. There is a lot of propaganda (especially the "controversy" section which fails to discuss that the linkage to "boot camps" is a media creation. The GAO report was highly biased. Dr adventure (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article!

Especially well referenced, good work! Sam Spade 15:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I actually went to two wilderness programs and know many people who have went to wilderness. Either the program has helped them, but they still misbehave or they are just plain pissed. I believe that this article is needs to be reevaluated for it's neutral point. --Bea 15:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbh123 (talk • contribs)

POV issues

I tagged the article with a POV template because much of the article appears designed not to convey information, but to tell people what to think. It does include sections written from different viewpoints, but the juxtaposition of different opinionated statements is not the same thing as objectivity. --Orlady (talk) 17:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 I actually went to two wilderness programs and know many people who have went to wilderness. Either the program has helped them, but they still misbehave or they are just plain pissed. I believe that this article is needs to be reevaluated for it's neutral point. --Bea 15:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bbh123|Bbh123]] ([[User talk:Bbh123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bbh123|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==POV issues==
+I tagged the article with a POV template because much of the article appears designed not to convey information, but to tell people what to think. It does include sections written from different viewpoints, but the juxtaposition of different opinionated statements is not the same thing as objectivity. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 17:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)