User talk:SimonKSK/Sandbox/Undertaker/CD!: Difference between revisions
Cheers dude (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Simon, I feel that's way too short and you're getting rid of a lot of pivotal information? I feel your last edit is totally unreasonable. [[User:Cheers dude|Cheers_Dude]] ([[User talk:Cheers dude|talk]]) 21:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
Simon, I feel that's way too short and you're getting rid of a lot of pivotal information? I feel your last edit is totally unreasonable. [[User:Cheers dude|Cheers_Dude]] ([[User talk:Cheers dude|talk]]) 21:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Your right, it is short. the druids should go back, but some of this stuff is really just trivia. Man, this can take a while. '''''<span style="background: #000000; "font-family:copperplate gothic light"><font color="black">S<small>imon</small></font><sub>[[User:SK2|<font size="2.5"><font color="OrangeRed">K</font>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:SK2|<font size="2.5"><font color="DarkCyan">S</font>]]</sup><sub>[[User:SK2/Guestbook|<font size="2.5"><font color="ForestGreen">K</font>]]</span></font></sub>''''' 21:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:50, 3 January 2009
Hey Simon :) This will actually be fun :D Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I just thought this explained his deadman gimmick more clearly. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, well I thought we could move the Paul Bearer stuff. The last two paragraphs maybe? Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Move it where? SimonKSK 21:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Well, just remove it from the article. You said find some things that aren't important and I thought since that was already kind of mentioned (though not as clearly in my opinion). I liked the Paul Bearer info because The Undertaker's character kind of has a background from childhood and teen years but I rather have the stuff up above and that's the most insignificant thing in my mind. Hey! I like your version, but check out this version out in a couple of seconds to the article and tell me what you think. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
A lot of the stuff about his trademarks are not needed, like the Tombstone thing. It's all mentioned. SimonKSK 21:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Simon, I feel that's way too short and you're getting rid of a lot of pivotal information? I feel your last edit is totally unreasonable. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your right, it is short. the druids should go back, but some of this stuff is really just trivia. Man, this can take a while. SimonKSK 21:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)