Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitzmas: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:53, 24 October 2005

Fitzmas

Merge with Plame Affair. If it still has legs in six months, break it out as its own page.
Very obscure, topic not worthy of Wikipedia Paul Dehaye 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please indicate which of the deletion criteria you are using. Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. - Paul Dehaye 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I concure, delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.120.97 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 75,000ish Google hits. — ceejayoz ^{talk .com} File:Australia flag large.png 23:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, DailyKoscruft. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:39, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- With 74,500 google hits it has gone well beyond dKoscruft Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but move to Plame Affair - Very obscure with no legs over time, but perhaps culturally relevant enough to incorporate into the Plame affair article. - Condorman 23:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This would violate the GFDL which requires that we keep all contributions. Guettarda 23:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks to Guettarda for feedback on viability of merging. Therefore, change vote to Delete. It's not viable as a standalone article. - Condorman 00:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Plame affair and redirect, as proposed on Talk:Fitzmas. --MarkSweep✍ 23:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - real, verifiable, over 74,500 google hits. Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Plame Affair after drastically paring down the text. Thesquire 23:57, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At most, it is worthy of a mention in the Plame Affair one of the lamest scandals in political history. Capitalistroadster 00:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even worthy of an entry into Plame Affair. WCC2005 00:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes the Google test, relates to a prominent news story, and is more relevant than many number other internet memes with self-contained articles on Wikipedia. Fumoses
M>e<r>g<e into Plame Affair, per MarkSweep and Thesquire. Information is happiest when it is most completely in context, and this term has ballooned in use among liberals gleefully anticipating turmoil. BDAbramson ^talk 01:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
merge or keep Kappa 01:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In a year's time, this cute little term will be forgotten by even the people who love it. This entry is nothing more than a vanity piece for Democrat Underground (and the one member in particular). Jinxmchue 02:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Fitzmas]]===
-* Merge with Plame Affair. If it still has legs in six months, break it out as its own page.
+* '''Merge''' with Plame Affair. If it still has legs in six months, break it out as its own page.
 * Very obscure, topic not worthy of Wikipedia [[User:Pdehaye|Paul Dehaye]] 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 *Please indicate which of the deletion criteria you are using.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)