Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Londonistan (term): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:34, 16 January 2009

Londonistan (term)

Nothing more than a dictionary definition (WP:DICDEF) which I don't see evolving beyond that (Islam in London covers the subject of well, Islam in London). Wiktionary already has an entry (wiktionary:Londonistan) Equendil Talk 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Equendil Talk 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! I've heard this term before in conversation and it may have legs and may be much more than a neologism. Let's see what sources are out there on the name from other editors.Critical Chris (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DICDEF. Just because you have heard of the term doesn't mean it needs an article. Tavix (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in line with Helengrad and other disparaging but notably sourced sobriquets for places. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sufficient sources exist to allow creation of an article. No causes presented for deletion. WilyD 12:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - is not a notable term (except among British neo-nazis) and is simply a WP:DICDEF - Ledenierhomme (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]].  </small><small>—[[User:Equendil|Equendil]] <small>[[User talk:Equendil|''Talk'']]</small> 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Strong Keep!''' I've heard this term before in conversation and it may have legs and may be much more than a neologism.  Let's see what sources are out there on the name from other editors.[[User:Critical Chris|Critical Chris]] ([[User talk:Critical Chris|talk]]) 23:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep!''' I've heard this term before in conversation and it may have legs and may be much more than a neologism.  Let's see what sources are out there on the name from other editors.[[User:Critical Chris|Critical Chris]] ([[User talk:Critical Chris|talk]]) 23:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per [[WP:DICDEF]]. Just because you have heard of the term doesn't mean it needs an article. '''[[User:Tavix|Tavix]]''' [[User talk:Tavix|(talk)]] 00:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' in line with [[Helengrad]] and other disparaging but notably sourced sobriquets for places. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 02:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' - sufficient sources exist to allow creation of an article.  No causes presented for deletion. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 12:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - is not a notable term (except among British neo-nazis) and is simply a [[WP:DICDEF]] - [[User:Ledenierhomme|Ledenierhomme]] ([[User talk:Ledenierhomme|talk]]) 13:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)