Talk:Sara Vietnam: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Where is the notability? |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::From [[WP:CORP#Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations]], ''"There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE or NASDAQ, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this case. However, sufficient independent sources usually exist for such companies that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage, analyst reports, and profiles by companies such as Hoover's (a commercial source).''...So, we have Hanoi Securities Trading Center, Alacrastore and Bloomberg links for Sara Vietnam in the External links section of the article. It should be sufficient. ... As this is a Vietnamese company, it might not have the same English-language profile on Google, that a company in the US or UK might have, which doesn't have anything to do with its notability ''per se''. --[[User:Mr Accountable|Mr Accountable]] ([[User talk:Mr Accountable|talk]]) 16:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
::From [[WP:CORP#Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations]], ''"There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE or NASDAQ, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this case. However, sufficient independent sources usually exist for such companies that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage, analyst reports, and profiles by companies such as Hoover's (a commercial source).''...So, we have Hanoi Securities Trading Center, Alacrastore and Bloomberg links for Sara Vietnam in the External links section of the article. It should be sufficient. ... As this is a Vietnamese company, it might not have the same English-language profile on Google, that a company in the US or UK might have, which doesn't have anything to do with its notability ''per se''. --[[User:Mr Accountable|Mr Accountable]] ([[User talk:Mr Accountable|talk]]) 16:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::The problem is that the links merely confirm the existence of the company. Where is the notability? <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">[[User:Frank|<span style="color:cyan;background:blue"> Frank </span>]] {{!}} [[user_talk:Frank|<span style="color:blue;background:cyan"> talk </span>]]</span></small> 16:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
:::The problem is that the links merely confirm the existence of the company. Where is the notability? <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">[[User:Frank|<span style="color:cyan;background:blue"> Frank </span>]] {{!}} [[user_talk:Frank|<span style="color:blue;background:cyan"> talk </span>]]</span></small> 16:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
::::? According to the quoted material from WP:CORP, the notability is there. --[[User:Mr Accountable|Mr Accountable]] ([[User talk:Mr Accountable|talk]]) 16:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:24, 22 January 2009
.svg){kind=small} | Vietnam Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Speedy deletion
Blatant advertising and spam...nope...I wrote 100% of this article so far, and you'll have to take my word for it, it's just an article. Or rather, a stub article. --Mr Accountable (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can you explain why you feel this company is notable, according to WP:N and WP:CORP? As the article is currently written, it does not appear to assert any notability from independent, reliable sources. Frank | talk 15:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- From WP:CORP#Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations, "There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE or NASDAQ, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this case. However, sufficient independent sources usually exist for such companies that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage, analyst reports, and profiles by companies such as Hoover's (a commercial source)....So, we have Hanoi Securities Trading Center, Alacrastore and Bloomberg links for Sara Vietnam in the External links section of the article. It should be sufficient. ... As this is a Vietnamese company, it might not have the same English-language profile on Google, that a company in the US or UK might have, which doesn't have anything to do with its notability per se. --Mr Accountable (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- The problem is that the links merely confirm the existence of the company. Where is the notability? Frank | talk 16:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ? According to the quoted material from WP:CORP, the notability is there. --Mr Accountable (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- The problem is that the links merely confirm the existence of the company. Where is the notability? Frank | talk 16:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- From WP:CORP#Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations, "There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE or NASDAQ, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this case. However, sufficient independent sources usually exist for such companies that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage, analyst reports, and profiles by companies such as Hoover's (a commercial source)....So, we have Hanoi Securities Trading Center, Alacrastore and Bloomberg links for Sara Vietnam in the External links section of the article. It should be sufficient. ... As this is a Vietnamese company, it might not have the same English-language profile on Google, that a company in the US or UK might have, which doesn't have anything to do with its notability per se. --Mr Accountable (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)