Warden's Five Rings: Difference between revisions
Changed "middle" ring to "center" ring to remove ambiguity. |
Category:Aerial warfare strategy, Category:Strategic bombing |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj99/fal99/belote.html Warden and the Air Corps Tactical School] |
* [http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj99/fal99/belote.html Warden and the Air Corps Tactical School] |
||
[[Category:Strategic bombing]] |
|||
[[Category:Aerial warfare strategy]] |
|||
{{US-mil-stub}} |
{{US-mil-stub}} |
||
Revision as of 15:56, 17 July 2009
 | This article may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. (March 2007) |
 | This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. |
Col. John A. Warden III, a former USAF officer and theorist of air power, established a theory of strategic attack based on five levels of system attributes. They are:
- Leadership
- Organic/System Essentials
- Infrastructure
- Population
- Fielded Military Forces.
Each level of system or "ring" was considered one of the enemy's centers of gravity. The idea behind Warden's five rings was to attack each of the rings to paralyze their forces, an objective also known as physical paralysis. To optimize a strike attack the attacker would engage as many rings as possible with special emphasis on taking out the center ring, which is the enemy's leadership. This would result in total physical paralysis.
Warden's theories on the application of air power in modern war have been criticized as little more than a reiteration of earlier strategic bombing concepts discredited by historical analysis of the Second World War and the Vietnam War.
See also
External links
- Air Theory for the Twenty-First Century, by Col. John Warden, USAF
- Warden and the Air Corps Tactical School
 | This United States military article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |