Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Junkers Ju 87: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:54, 11 April 2009

Junkers Ju 87

This article was recently promoted to GA status. The reviewing editor suggested I should push for FA status, so I thought I would go for A-Class first. Dapi89 (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you requested a copyedit on the article? I have some problem areas, beginning in the second paragraph of the lead section; "easily recognizable" (by whom?), "fixed spatted undercarriage" (or is it its spatted, fixed undercarriage), etc.. I did not review the article for extensive use of technical jargon, but the caption for the photo of the wrecked Ju 87b refers to, "...positive and negative dihedral." While the photo and the caption are obviously intended to highlight something about the aircraft, I can't determine if it is the exposed spar and ribs, or the attachment bolt, or something else. Dihedral is not linked in any of its instances. I will hold my vote in reserve until further review of the article. --Born2flie (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:20, 21 February 2009 edit Dapi89 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 52,627 edits ←Created page with '=== Junkers Ju 87 === This article was recently promoted to GA status. The reviewing editor suggested I should push for FA status, so I thought I would go for …'		Revision as of 13:54, 11 April 2009 edit undo Born2flie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,566 edits →Junkers Ju 87: comment Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This article was recently promoted to GA status. The reviewing editor suggested I should push for FA status, so I thought I would go for A-Class first. [[User:Dapi89\|Dapi89]] ([[User talk:Dapi89\|talk]]) 18:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)		This article was recently promoted to GA status. The reviewing editor suggested I should push for FA status, so I thought I would go for A-Class first. [[User:Dapi89\|Dapi89]] ([[User talk:Dapi89\|talk]]) 18:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

			*Have you requested a copyedit on the article? I have some problem areas, beginning in the second paragraph of the lead section; "easily recognizable" (by whom?), "fixed spatted undercarriage" (or is it ''its spatted, fixed undercarriage''), etc.. I did not review the article for extensive use of technical jargon, but the caption for the photo of the wrecked Ju 87b refers to, "...positive and negative dihedral." While the photo and the caption are obviously intended to highlight something about the aircraft, I can't determine if it is the exposed spar and ribs, or the attachment bolt, or something else. ''Dihedral'' is not linked in any of its instances. I will hold my vote in reserve until further review of the article. --[[User:Born2flie\|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie\|talk]]) 13:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)