Jump to content

Information commons: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Amacurak (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 274831386 by Amacurak (talk)
Amacurak (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 274831192 by Amacurak (talk)
Line 2: Line 2:
:''For the building at the University of Sheffield, please see [[Information Commons, Sheffield]].''
:''For the building at the University of Sheffield, please see [[Information Commons, Sheffield]].''


Information commons refers to our shared knowledge-base and the processes that facilitate or hinder its use. The concept of the "information commons" emphasizes some of those principles that also apply to the natural commons, such as preservation, conservation for future generations, etc. It can refer to any of a number of data storage and retrieval mechanisms that seek to make public data more easily accessible. It can also refer to a physical space, usually in an academic library, where any and all can participate in the processes of information research, gathering and production. The idea of an information commons is derived from the medieval European concept of the [[commons]], or the land that villagers shared for grazing purposes. The issues that fall under this topic are varied and include :
The concept of the "information commons" emphasizes some of those principles that also apply to the natural commons, such as preservation, conservation for future generations, etc. Information commons refers to our shared knowledge-base and the processes that facilitate or hinder its use. It also refers to a physical space, usually in an academic library, where any and all can participate in the processes of information research, gathering and production. The term [[commons]] refers to the land (or common grounds) that villagers shared for grazing purposes in simpler times. The issues that fall under this topic are varied and include :
* [[License]]s written to access digital content,
* [[License]]s written to access digital content,
* [[Copyright]] law and similar [[intellectual property]],
* [[Copyright]] law and similar [[intellectual property]],
Line 16: Line 16:
* and much more.
* and much more.


Some advocates of information commons believe that the increasing control and commodification of information restricts our ability to foster positive developments in our cultural, academic, and economic growth.
Some believe that the increasing control and com modification of information restricts our ability to encourage and foster positive developments in our cultural, academic, and economic growth.


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==

Revision as of 03:06, 4 March 2009

For the building at the University of Sheffield, please see Information Commons, Sheffield.

The concept of the "information commons" emphasizes some of those principles that also apply to the natural commons, such as preservation, conservation for future generations, etc. Information commons refers to our shared knowledge-base and the processes that facilitate or hinder its use. It also refers to a physical space, usually in an academic library, where any and all can participate in the processes of information research, gathering and production. The term commons refers to the land (or common grounds) that villagers shared for grazing purposes in simpler times. The issues that fall under this topic are varied and include :

Some believe that the increasing control and com modification of information restricts our ability to encourage and foster positive developments in our cultural, academic, and economic growth.

Bibliography

  • Beagle, Donald Robert, with Donald Russell Bailey and Barbara Tierney (contributors). 2006. The Information Commons Handbook. Neal-Schuman Publishers. 247 p. ISBN 1-55570-562-6
  • Collier, David. 2005. Brand Name Bullies : The Quest to Own and Control Culture. Wiley. ISBN 0-471-67927-5
  • Burr ell, Robert and Alison Coleman. 2005. Copyright Exceptions : the Digital Impact. Cambridge University Press. 426 p. ISBN 0-521-84726-5
  • Free Culture
  • Griffith, Jonathan and Ma Sutherland. 2005. Copyright and Free Speech : Comparative and International Analyzes. Oxford University Press. 426 p. ISBN 0-19-927604-8