Talk:General linear model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:37, 13 March 2009

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

isn't this just the same as Generalized linear model? Gtx from the country of the football championships ;-) Frank1101 21:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the generalized linear model is considerably more general than the general linear model. (This is obviously not the greatest terminology, but it is standard.) -- Walt Pohl 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the "Application" section give one example from neuroimaging that is less-than-obvious, when the GLM underlies almost all simple statistical tests and therefore has a plentiful supply of clear and easy-to-understand examples? --user: NotTires —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.237.26.204 (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More on terminology

The above says "it is standard" but there is no citation. Kendall&Stuart use "general linear regression model" for what is is otherwise called "multiple regression" ie a univariate independent variable. I believe I have seem "multivariate regrsssion" used generally for the problem as described in the article: for example by Zellner(1971) An introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics, Wiley ISBN 0-471-98165-6. But I cannot find this in my stats dictionaries. However "General linear model" does not appear either. So, any citations for the term "General linear model" used in the sense of the present article? Melcombe (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:37, 13 March 2009 edit Melcombe (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 18,880 edits →More on terminology: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:37, 13 March 2009 edit undo Melcombe (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 18,880 edits typo Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== More on terminology ==		== More on terminology ==

	The above says "it is standard" but there is no citation. Kendall&Stuart use "general linear regression model" for what is is otherwise called "multiple regression" ie a univariate independent variable. I believe I have seem "multivariate regrsssion" used generally for the problem as described in the article: for example by Zellner(1971) ''An introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics", Wiley ISBN 0-471-98165-6. But I cannot find this in my stats dictionaries. However "General linear model" does not appear either. So, any citations for the term "General linear model" used in the sense of the present article? [[User:Melcombe\|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe\|talk]]) 16:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		The above says "it is standard" but there is no citation. Kendall&Stuart use "general linear regression model" for what is is otherwise called "multiple regression" ie a univariate independent variable. I believe I have seem "multivariate regrsssion" used generally for the problem as described in the article: for example by Zellner(1971) ''An introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics'', Wiley ISBN 0-471-98165-6. But I cannot find this in my stats dictionaries. However "General linear model" does not appear either. So, any citations for the term "General linear model" used in the sense of the present article? [[User:Melcombe\|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe\|talk]]) 16:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)