Talk:Propeller.com: Difference between revisions
Computerjoe (talk | contribs) m Add {{WikiProject Blogging}} banner. Please assess! using AWB |
ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) not a blog; changing project |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Internet}} |
||
With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as [http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/propeller-will-be-the-new-netscape-digg-clone/ TechCrunch], [http://www.searchenginejournal.com/netscape-social-news-rebranding-to-propellercom/5627/ Search Engine Journal], and [http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529 Search Engine Watch], it is definitely noteworthy. [[User:TheGiftedOne|TheGiftedOne]] ([[User talk:TheGiftedOne|talk]]) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as [http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/propeller-will-be-the-new-netscape-digg-clone/ TechCrunch], [http://www.searchenginejournal.com/netscape-social-news-rebranding-to-propellercom/5627/ Search Engine Journal], and [http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529 Search Engine Watch], it is definitely noteworthy. [[User:TheGiftedOne|TheGiftedOne]] ([[User talk:TheGiftedOne|talk]]) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:48, 2 May 2010
Internet Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as TechCrunch, Search Engine Journal, and Search Engine Watch, it is definitely noteworthy. TheGiftedOne (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Growth
The growth section, I believe, is completely wrong. First of all, Propeller.com was launched in September when Netscape moved out - no wonder the growth was extreme. According to Alexa, however, the number of visitors is steadily declining. Second, Digg and Propeller are no bookmarking sites. Third, Propeller is not near Digg [1]. All in all, I think the section is completely misleading and should be deleted. NisseSthlm (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree, so I deleted it. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)