Jump to content

Talk:Propeller.com: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Add {{WikiProject Blogging}} banner. Please assess! using AWB
ScottyBerg (talk | contribs)
not a blog; changing project
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Blogging}}
{{WikiProject Internet}}


With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as [http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/propeller-will-be-the-new-netscape-digg-clone/ TechCrunch], [http://www.searchenginejournal.com/netscape-social-news-rebranding-to-propellercom/5627/ Search Engine Journal], and [http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529 Search Engine Watch], it is definitely noteworthy. [[User:TheGiftedOne|TheGiftedOne]] ([[User talk:TheGiftedOne|talk]]) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as [http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/propeller-will-be-the-new-netscape-digg-clone/ TechCrunch], [http://www.searchenginejournal.com/netscape-social-news-rebranding-to-propellercom/5627/ Search Engine Journal], and [http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070913-120529 Search Engine Watch], it is definitely noteworthy. [[User:TheGiftedOne|TheGiftedOne]] ([[User talk:TheGiftedOne|talk]]) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:48, 2 May 2010

WikiProject iconInternet Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

With a current Alexa ranking averaging in the 1800 range, coupled with references from reliable resources such as TechCrunch, Search Engine Journal, and Search Engine Watch, it is definitely noteworthy. TheGiftedOne (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Growth

The growth section, I believe, is completely wrong. First of all, Propeller.com was launched in September when Netscape moved out - no wonder the growth was extreme. According to Alexa, however, the number of visitors is steadily declining. Second, Digg and Propeller are no bookmarking sites. Third, Propeller is not near Digg [1]. All in all, I think the section is completely misleading and should be deleted. NisseSthlm (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I deleted it. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]