Talk:Ex-ante: Difference between revisions
MartinGugino (talk | contribs) |
proposed move to ex ante |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ([[User:MartinGugino | Martin]] | <small>[[User_talk:MartinGugino | talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MartinGugino|contribs]] </small> 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)) |
I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ([[User:MartinGugino | Martin]] | <small>[[User_talk:MartinGugino | talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MartinGugino|contribs]] </small> 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)) |
||
==Proposed move== |
|||
Based on [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=ex-ante%2Cex+ante&year_start=1700&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cex%20-%20ante%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cex%20ante%3B%2Cc0 google ngram], the common case is to ''not'' use a hyphen (which follows the style manuals I'm familiar with), and the single-word case is rare enough to be considered a typo. Any objection to moving this article to [[ex ante]]? [[User:Catherine Quotidian|Catherine Quotidian]] ([[User talk:Catherine Quotidian|talk]]) 22:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:09, 7 January 2014
before, at, after the event?
then what are the phrase for at the event & after the event? Jackzhp (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
extremely high level of expertise is implied
"Another example of the use of the term ex-ante is in the recruitment industry: Ex-ante is often used when forecasting resource requirements on large future projects. When the word ex-ante is used in this context, an extremely high level of expertise is implied..."
The tone of this paragraph sets off alarm bells for me. I hope someone who understands this matter happens along and re-writes this -- or gets rid of it! -69.87.199.130 (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ( Martin | talk • contribs 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC))
Proposed move
Based on google ngram, the common case is to not use a hyphen (which follows the style manuals I'm familiar with), and the single-word case is rare enough to be considered a typo. Any objection to moving this article to ex ante? Catherine Quotidian (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)