Talk:Philippines–United States relations: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:10, 19 March 2009

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article clearly is not neutral, and needs editing. It glosses over certain negative issues such as the Philippine Senate rejecting an extension of the Military Bases Agreement. There was growing resentment(and questionable constitutionality) of that agreement at that time. I think this article just paints a rosey picture without providing much in the way of facts. Ealpert (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Everything in this article is factually accurate. The absence of criticism doesn't invalidate the info of the article or makes it "factless". --85.220.69.85 (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 This article clearly is not neutral, and needs editing.  It glosses over certain negative issues such as the Philippine Senate rejecting an extension of the Military Bases Agreement.  There was growing resentment(and questionable constitutionality) of that agreement at that time.  I think this article just paints a rosey picture without providing much in the way of facts.
-Everything in this article is factually accurate. The absence of criticism doesn't invalidate the info of the article or makes it "factless".
---[[Special:Contributions/85.220.69.85|85.220.69.85]] ([[User talk:85.220.69.85|talk]]) 01:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 [[User:Ealpert|Ealpert]] ([[User talk:Ealpert|talk]]) 20:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
+Everything in this article is factually accurate. The absence of criticism doesn't invalidate the info of the article or makes it "factless".
+--[[Special:Contributions/85.220.69.85|85.220.69.85]] ([[User talk:85.220.69.85|talk]]) 01:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)