Jump to content

Talk:It's Just a Plant: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rated mid importance
Added comment on assessment
Line 21: Line 21:


Yes, you're right, I couldn't get a complete version of the book. I tried to finish off the plot with information from a newspaper book review, but someone with the actual book should make the last part a little more detail. Also, please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. This helps in identifying who said what. Regards, [[User:FingersOnRoids|<span style="color:gray">FingersOn</span><b><span style="color:darkgreen">Roids</span></b>]] 21:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, you're right, I couldn't get a complete version of the book. I tried to finish off the plot with information from a newspaper book review, but someone with the actual book should make the last part a little more detail. Also, please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. This helps in identifying who said what. Regards, [[User:FingersOnRoids|<span style="color:gray">FingersOn</span><b><span style="color:darkgreen">Roids</span></b>]] 21:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

== Assessment ==
As requested on [[WP:YA|WikiProject Children's Literature, I have read through this article for assessment, and I agree with the current rating of Start class. To improve, I reccomend rewriting the Plot section to avoid an in-universe perspective, and extending the non-plot secions of the article - improving 'Critical Response' and adding more sections, explaining why the author wrote the book and other background information. If you have any comments on this assessment, please leave them on my talk page. [[User:Strdst_grl|<span style="font-family:Bernhard Modern Roman;color:CornflowerBlue">strdst_grl</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Strdst_grl|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:LightSkyBlue">(call me Stardust)]]</span></small> 20:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:52, 10 April 2009

WikiProject iconChildren's literature Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Things you can do

Why we should have this article

I think that this book is sufficiently important to be part of wikipedia. Therefore, I have created a draft here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onefive15 (talkcontribs) 15:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

Hang on a second, this book actually looks like its pretty notable. Let me try and expand it. Regards, FingersOnRoids 20:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A video worth watching

This is a YouTube video in which the author makes an appearance on Bill O'Reilly's show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kssS_TEeQfU&feature=rec-HM-fresh+div Onefive15 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot: incomplete?

Hey there. I think that the summery offered at the book's website leaves out parts in the published version. See http://www.justaplant.com/story/15end.html (you can get to there by clicking through the "story" part of the site). Does anyone own a tangible copy?Onefive15 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right, I couldn't get a complete version of the book. I tried to finish off the plot with information from a newspaper book review, but someone with the actual book should make the last part a little more detail. Also, please sign your comments with ~~~~. This helps in identifying who said what. Regards, FingersOnRoids 21:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

As requested on [[WP:YA|WikiProject Children's Literature, I have read through this article for assessment, and I agree with the current rating of Start class. To improve, I reccomend rewriting the Plot section to avoid an in-universe perspective, and extending the non-plot secions of the article - improving 'Critical Response' and adding more sections, explaining why the author wrote the book and other background information. If you have any comments on this assessment, please leave them on my talk page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 20:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]