Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Susan Boyle: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sun Creator (talk | contribs) Create page. |
→Susan Boyle: - GA first |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== [[Susan Boyle]] === |
=== [[Susan Boyle]] === |
||
Requesting review of article as has already attracted [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASusan_Boyle&diff=285137361&oldid=285111320 favourable attention] and [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/19/AR2009041900508_pf.html news coverage] from [[The Washington Post]]. It would be good to encourage editors by showing what is possible on Wikipedia in a short time. Would like to review to [[:Category:A-Class_biography_articles|A-Class]]. [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] ([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]]) 04:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
Requesting review of article as has already attracted [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASusan_Boyle&diff=285137361&oldid=285111320 favourable attention] and [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/19/AR2009041900508_pf.html news coverage] from [[The Washington Post]]. It would be good to encourage editors by showing what is possible on Wikipedia in a short time. Would like to review to [[:Category:A-Class_biography_articles|A-Class]]. [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] ([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]]) 04:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I could probably round up a couple of editors to look at this article. It's exceptional work for such a short time. But you should put it up for GA first. That's the usual order of things, and GA has more active reviewers that can give you pointers on how to improve the article. -[[User:Duribald|Duribald]] ([[User talk:Duribald|talk]]) 11:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:36, 21 April 2009
Requesting review of article as has already attracted favourable attention and news coverage from The Washington Post. It would be good to encourage editors by showing what is possible on Wikipedia in a short time. Would like to review to A-Class. SunCreator (talk) 04:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- I could probably round up a couple of editors to look at this article. It's exceptional work for such a short time. But you should put it up for GA first. That's the usual order of things, and GA has more active reviewers that can give you pointers on how to improve the article. -Duribald (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)