Talk:National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933: Difference between revisions
Good Article nominee |
Shubinator (talk | contribs) Article appeared on DYK on April 24, 2009 |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{GA nominee|22:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=Law|status=}} |
{{GA nominee|22:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=Law|status=}} |
||
{{dyktalk|24 April|2009}} |
|||
==External Links== |
==External Links== |
Revision as of 21:50, 24 April 2009
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 22:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
A fact from National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2009 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April. |
External Links
http://www.fee.org/pdf/the-freeman/1005RMEColumn.pdf I removed this link because it points to a biased political opinion that contains no documentation and adds little knowledge about the subject, NIRA. I substituted a link to a page that gives a brief discussion of the act and the full text of the legislation. Demeny 18:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Old talk
It is a little confusing Hello...i dont understand this site very well and it is making my brain have an ache
Well, go to the help, and if you have further questions, you can ask questions at my talk at Cameron Nedland 21:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Since I have no idea how to make a new subject deal... I was just wondereing what went wrong here
The NIRA was strongly supported by leading businessmen, some of whom had helped draft the legislation. Gerard Swope, head of General Electric, was one of whats pas first champions of this legislation—which legalized cartels and encouraged government spending on public works.
Thanks 2-28-07
Academic peer-reviewed criticism of this article
From Rosenzweig's article: "the essay on the United States from 1918 to 1945 inaccurately describes the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 as in part a response to the “dissident challenges” of Huey Long and Father Charles Coughlin—a curious characterization of a law enacted when Coughlin was still an enthusiastic backer of Roosevelt and Long was an official (if increasingly critical) ally [...] the essay’s incomplete, almost capricious, coverage than by the minor errors". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
What about the NIRA?
I was originally searching for info about Roosevelt's NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act), and it redirected me straight to the NRA page. They definitely are not the same thing...I don't know if the page simply does not exist, but there's no indication that an article about it was not found, only that this one was found.
If I could just get some clarification on this, I would be very grateful! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbymatt3 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you mis-typed. NIRA has re-directed to this article since 2005. Jheiv (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)