Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janko.at: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:10, 31 May 2009

Janko.at

Contested WP:PROD. No sources are cited, getting a "website of the week" award does not confer notability. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find any references, Alexa ranking about 158K. Also, it could be G12, the puzzles section is an exact copy of Janko.at - Puzzles, but that isn't saying much, since it's just a listing of all the games available. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Janko.at has recieved other honors besides "Website of the Week", I just have a hard time understanding/translating them because I know very little German. Since 17 October 1999, Janko.at has had 1,768,792 visitors. Almost every month since the beginning of 2008, Janko.at's creators have added at least 100, but usually about 200 new puzzles of various types. That's not including photos, recipes, freeware and adventure game walkthroughs. It is an AMAZING site for puzzle fans. It's a hidden treasure trove that I just want to get the word out about.

Please just give me a few day of working on the article before you propose it for deletion. I only just started on it. Gatorgirl7563 (talk) 01:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD period is seven days from the time of nomination, so you've got some time, but it's really going to need some reliable sources if it's to be kept. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) The majority of deletion discussions run for seven days, so you will have at least that much time to find and add reliable, published sources to the article to demonstrate that this website passes the General Notability Guideline for inclusion, and/or the inclusion guideline for web-based content. -- saberwyn 01:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —-- saberwyn 01:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources as to notability show up. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there are zero sources. The article reads like a press release and the site is not even in English. meshach (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—-- [[User:Saberwyn|saberwyn]] 01:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' unless reliable sources as to notability show up.  [[User:Who then was a gentleman?|Who then was a gentleman?]] ([[User talk:Who then was a gentleman?|talk]]) 02:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', there are zero sources.  The article reads like a press release and the site is not even in English.  [[User:Meshach|meshach]] ([[User talk:Meshach|talk]]) 02:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)