Talk:List of Pokémon (202–251)

Pictures The least you can do is show some pictures! I mean people would want to know what the Pokemon look like! LIKE ME! WHO DELETED THE PICTURES! thank you for reading —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigirl16 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Expanding

HELP ME FINISH THESE. PLEASE. I'M NO GOOD. PLEASE HELP. --Blank88 00:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Considering it's one of your first major edits, you did fairly decent. I don't know how to merge either, but as far as setting up the list you were doing a nice job of it. (I should know; I've done A LOT worse on my first major edit to a wiki . . . defaced the html on the entire page, I did!) Anyways, I fixed it up so that it is ready for merging, or at least close to it. -WarthogDemon 00:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

You guys know that your missing Shuckle, right?Stormfin 23:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

He's been added now. :) -WarthogDemon 01:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Wobbuffet

Wobbuffet deserves its own page. It's character in the anime isn't small and has its own personality. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.89.5.18 (talk) 09:37, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

It's needs WAY more than common anime appearance to deserve its own article. However it could deserve an own paragraph for being big part of the anime, but no, I disagree with own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBlazikenMaster (talk • contribs) 22:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Untitled section

I liked the old way the Pokemon pages were... Why were they changed to this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.141.91.242 (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Since I'm on a vocation from Wikipedia, I will only give a short reply: Check WT:PCP. TheBlazikenMaster 22:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Unown

I think there should be images/an image of all the unown forms... no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.102.197 (talk) 20:34, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

No. SpigotMap 20:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

If they were random symbols, rather than the alphabet with two punctuation marks, we'd probably add two or three but not all. I suppose if it was okay, there could be a picture showing all of them at once, though such an image would hard to make out as a thumb and probably wouldn't look very clean. -WarthogDemon 20:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The way it was

Why on earth was this changed?

It doesnt seem to contribute anything, and I do not seem to find any reason to get rid of the Pokemon Pages as they were.

Before, it was easy to use Wikipedia to find Sugimori Art of the Individual Pokemon needed, and to look up facts on the myths and legends behind these creatures.

Now these pages are useless, and serve no purpose, so why not bring back the old individual pages and revert it back to the way it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SHTR (talk • contribs) 11:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Check the archives of WP:PCP. If you want the Sugimori art, try Bulbapedia or Google Images. MelicansMatkin (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Just a Thought

Why don't any of the Pokemon mini-articles ever mention if they are obtainable in Colosseum or XD? You don't need that much detail about it, just to mention their presence as a Snaggable Shadow. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 12:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Might be considered game guide information. -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 13:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

But it isn't. Game guide data would be the specific location and rarity of a given Pokemon in a given game. The problem is that some don't assume Colosseum and XD to be real games, so they assume they don't need mentioning. Just say they are there! We can mention them in passing, as long as we don't say how many trainers have one on their team. Sincerifically, 2D Backfire Master (talk) 01:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

So it Seems...

The section about Wobbuffet has some interesting information. Particularly the reference to an obscure Japanese comedian. Not that obscurity matters, just that it seems to be Original Research. Is it? I can't tell, so I'm not deleting it. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

So it Seems...

The section about Wobbuffet has some interesting information. Particularly the reference to an obscure Japanese comedian. Not that obscurity matters, just that it seems to be Original Research. Is it? I can't tell, so I'm not deleting it. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)