Jump to content

Talk:French catheter scale: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
merger proposal: closing proposal, merged
Line 20: Line 20:


==merger proposal==
==merger proposal==
{{archive top}}
*'''Merged''' --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Can't see any reason to have two separate pages, one just for the chart: [[French catheter scale chart]]. [[User:Saintswithin|Saint]]|[[User talk:Saintswithin|swithin]] 08:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Can't see any reason to have two separate pages, one just for the chart: [[French catheter scale chart]]. [[User:Saintswithin|Saint]]|[[User talk:Saintswithin|swithin]] 08:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. - [[User:Draeco|Draeco]] ([[User talk:Draeco|talk]]) 17:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. - [[User:Draeco|Draeco]] ([[User talk:Draeco|talk]]) 17:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Line 27: Line 30:
*'''Support''' merge. The scale looks like it would be better suited as being part of this page. [[User:Madkayaker|madkayaker]] ([[User talk:Madkayaker|talk]]) 14:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. The scale looks like it would be better suited as being part of this page. [[User:Madkayaker|madkayaker]] ([[User talk:Madkayaker|talk]]) 14:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. Having the chart on the same page could help clear confusion. [[User:PhysicsPat|PhysicsPat]] ([[User talk:PhysicsPat|talk]]) 06:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merge. Having the chart on the same page could help clear confusion. [[User:PhysicsPat|PhysicsPat]] ([[User talk:PhysicsPat|talk]]) 06:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}

Revision as of 15:37, 31 January 2010

WikiProject iconMedicine Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somebody know where I can find mor infirmation from this issue? Thanks to all.

very confusing

I find the description very confusing. according to what is written here, the French scale gives the circumference and to get the diameter, one divides the French size by pi (3.14159 ...) . This does not agree with the conversion table given in the attached picture. The scaling factor is more like F = 3 * mm. Any body agrees ?

  • I agree, this is somewhat confusing. It's as though it was written by someone who either doesn't know the subject matter very well, or doesn't quite know how to write clearly. Perhaps this is a result of sloppy editing...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.133.107 (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I also agree the article is very confusing and in contradiction to information I have learned... In respiratory care we frequently use catheters which come in French sizes, we were taught the conversion is (French/3.14)*2... so a 14fr would be 8.9mm or 9mm...



I think the description is perfectly clear. Fr measures diameter, NOT circumference. I just verified this with the engineers around here (a medical device company; we make catheters in this department). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.173.1.45 (talk) 20:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The chart page is redundant- the graphic contains all of the info needed. The reference to the circumference is just plain wrong- the definition is 3 times the OUTSIDE diameter in millimeters, rounded to the nearest whole number. You will sometimes see things like 7.5 Fr, which makes me crazy. Sorry, doctors are not engineers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wa9kws (talkcontribs) 20:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Can't see any reason to have two separate pages, one just for the chart: French catheter scale chart. Saint|swithin 08:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.