User talk:68.52.42.38: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
+tag |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{whois|Comcast Cable}} |
{{whois|Comcast Cable}} |
||
{{repeat vandal}} <!-- Do not remove this, as it is exactly the reason you were blocked among other things. --> |
|||
:Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows: |
:Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows: |
||
Removal of comments, warnings |
Removal of comments, warnings |
||
Revision as of 02:59, 20 September 2009
 | Attention:
This . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
 | This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
- Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows:
Removal of comments, warnings Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices (while blocks are still in effect), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates(left this--The Whois). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.
Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!