Talk:Spray (sailing vessel): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:55, 11 September 2010

Ships B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

One might note there's a fictional Spray in the Wheel of Time. --Falos 00:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The included quotation is far too long for this article and should be cut down by 80% or more. Just link to the appropriate point in the book for anyone who wants to read the rest since there are many online editions. 24.136.6.69 06:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seaworthiness negotiable?

I find the last paragraph--on seaworthiness--pretty odd. To my (very inexpert) knowledge, the very idea of (smaller) freak waves and white squalls etc. is that a seemingly sea-worthy boat or ship can turn out to be not at all seaworthy when simply running into conditions that are rare, but not unheard of. Although I don't like other parts of the book (particularly the section on the Pamir), Tall Ships Down argues reasonably that a ship's stability or resistence to capsizing can be clearly underestimated by the captains.

I'd like to delete the respective parts of the paragraph. --Ibn Battuta (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Infobox

98.196.146.113 (talk) 23:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stability Analysis

I cannot track down the Chapelle quote. Other quotes by Chapelle in Slack (cited in article pp. 57-60, 67-69) do not mention the boat's stability -- an omission that implies Slack also found no mention by this expert. I question the validity of this quote and recommend it be considered for deletion.

The sources cited in the article, including Slack, speak favorably of Spray's stability. Slack determined the boat to be eminently seaworthy, as have other sources cited and seagoing replicas of the original.

98.196.146.113 (talk) 21:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you search Google Books using 'Slocum Spray Chapelle', there are a couple of hits that indirectly reference Chapelle's analysis claiming that the vessel was unstable. Most of these are recent books not available except in "snippet view" on Google Books, so you would have to track down the originals if you want an exact quote. Nevertheless, there does not appear to be a good reason at this time to remove the claim from the article. Also, while it is worth mentioning that many seagoing replicas have been built, they do not by themselves prove stability of the original vessel.216.80.110.88 (talk) 01:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:10, 21 September 2009 edit 216.80.110.88 (talk) →Stability Analysis ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:55, 11 September 2010 edit undo Brad101 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 66,813 edits B class checklist for wp:ships Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Ships\|class=~~Start~~\|~~importance~~=~~Low~~}}		{{WikiProject Ships\|class=b\|B1=y\|B2=y\|B3=y\|B4=y\|B5=y}}

	One might note there's a fictional ''Spray'' in the [[The_Wheel_of_Time\|Wheel of Time]]. --[[User:Falos\|Falos]] 00:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)		One might note there's a fictional ''Spray'' in the [[The_Wheel_of_Time\|Wheel of Time]]. --[[User:Falos\|Falos]] 00:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)