Talk:ATP test: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The title of this article seems a little generic. ''ATP test'' doesn't really describe what the test is; The test is actually a living organism detection assay, which looks for ATP. I'm guessing ''ATP test'' is jargon. Is there a more descriptive name? [[User:Pdcook|Pdcook]] ([[User talk:Pdcook|talk]]) 01:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
The title of this article seems a little generic. ''ATP test'' doesn't really describe what the test is; The test is actually a living organism detection assay, which looks for ATP. I'm guessing ''ATP test'' is jargon. Is there a more descriptive name? [[User:Pdcook|Pdcook]] ([[User talk:Pdcook|talk]]) 01:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
The name for the article is chosen based on an alternate testing method called 'Plate Count' or 'Culture test'. In order for people to find the article, a generic name seems best to me; however, if anyone has a suggestion for a better name than by all means let me know. [[User:Dieselbub|Dieselbub]] ([[User talk:Dieselbub|talk]]) 11:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Additional references == |
== Additional references == |
||
Revision as of 11:28, 19 October 2009
Better title for this article?
The title of this article seems a little generic. ATP test doesn't really describe what the test is; The test is actually a living organism detection assay, which looks for ATP. I'm guessing ATP test is jargon. Is there a more descriptive name? Pdcook (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The name for the article is chosen based on an alternate testing method called 'Plate Count' or 'Culture test'. In order for people to find the article, a generic name seems best to me; however, if anyone has a suggestion for a better name than by all means let me know. Dieselbub (talk) 11:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Additional references
This article is on the verge of being an advertisement. Can we get some other references that aren't luminultra.com? Pdcook (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The references provided do not link to any of LuminUltra's products - just resource materials. LuminUltra does extensive research in the field and the references are valid. Unless the companies products are mentioned and described (which they are not) I see no reason for it to be considered an ad. Like any Wiki ad, people are welcome to add more material and site additional resources.Dieselbub (talk) 11:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)