User talk:Keysvolume: Difference between revisions
Keysvolume (talk | contribs) |
Keysvolume (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I had ''my'' suspicions. [http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/a/a6/Pwned-cat_headshot.jpg]--[[User:Misortie|Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^]] ([[User talk:Misortie|talk]]) 16:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
I had ''my'' suspicions. [http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/a/a6/Pwned-cat_headshot.jpg]--[[User:Misortie|Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^]] ([[User talk:Misortie|talk]]) 16:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|Please run a checkuser. I am not a sock of Mehrunissa, unlike the '''real'' sock master [[User:Vinter-light]] |
{{unblock|Please run a checkuser. I am not a sock of Mehrunissa, unlike the '''real'' sock master [[User:Vinter-light]]. The accusation of "abusing multiple accounts is based not on any technical or incontrovertible evidence, but the whims of an admin being manipulated by [[User:Vinter-light]] (see the conversation [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToddst1&action=historysubmit&diff=321955812&oldid=321948222 here]. My ip address is not even from the same subnet or domain as the other anon ip editor being mentioned.}} |
Revision as of 22:18, 25 October 2009
Keysvolume (talk) 15:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Who are you? I do not think you are an administrator. Why are you putting sockpuppet tags on my talk page? --Vinter-light (talk) 03:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi fellow editor. Your addition to Hindu's and Jhatka were very good, but would it be possible to add some references for what you have added? Books with ISBN numbers would be welcome.--Sikh-History 09:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Please note this, wrt to the Indian students in Oz article YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 04:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Apologies.
Looks like I got it wrong, that sock was adding pure garbage. And I never accused you of being a sock, I made the mistake of going to the article after seeing it on the request for protection page and instantly reverted based on what I thought was an edit war, I also checked on your page and saw you are being accused of sock puppetry. If that makes any sense. --Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC){{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)I had my suspicions. [1]--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Keysvolume (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Change
{{unblock}}
to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}