Talk:Cocktail dress: Difference between revisions
LeilaLynch (talk | contribs) |
→www.fashionable-advice.clothingforstyle.com: Sounds like a great idea. |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
My apologies for the second undo, but I've removed the material you added from your website. While I can see you're trying to constructively contribute and you've solved the copyright problems, that material fails [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] as [[WP:SPS]]. Bluntly, just because you published it on your website, doesn't make it true. Beyond that, the material is more of a style guide which we don't do per [[WP:HOWTO]]. While many folks think that type of info would be useful on Wikipedia, we have made a decision not to include that type of material. I hope this helps. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
My apologies for the second undo, but I've removed the material you added from your website. While I can see you're trying to constructively contribute and you've solved the copyright problems, that material fails [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] as [[WP:SPS]]. Bluntly, just because you published it on your website, doesn't make it true. Beyond that, the material is more of a style guide which we don't do per [[WP:HOWTO]]. While many folks think that type of info would be useful on Wikipedia, we have made a decision not to include that type of material. I hope this helps. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
: Hi Toddst1, thanks for your notes. I'm still thinking about expanding of this article. This time I divided to consult with you first. I'm thinking about leaving History section with a reference to "da Cruz, Elyssa. "Dressing for the Cocktail Hour". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000". As for rest of my content, I'm thinking about External Links section. Is such modification acceptable? WBR Leila Lynch 21:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
: Hi Toddst1, thanks for your notes. I'm still thinking about expanding of this article. This time I divided to consult with you first. I'm thinking about leaving History section with a reference to "da Cruz, Elyssa. "Dressing for the Cocktail Hour". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000". As for rest of my content, I'm thinking about External Links section. Is such modification acceptable? WBR Leila Lynch 21:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Sounds like a great idea. Let me know if you need help with the [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]]. Good luck. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 21:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:47, 12 November 2009
 | Fashion C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Image
The old image Image:PromDress.JPG was only a Prom dress - not a classical Cocktail dress like Image:Cocktail dress 22209831.jpg. I've exchanged the images --Herrick 13:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, should've read this before reverting. Still, there ought to be an even better picture out there.... -- Smjg 23:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I see problems with both images - the prom one is a poor pose and the dres isn't so good. the cocktail dress image can barely be seen. I took a look on Commons and flickr and came up with a few alternatives we could consider:
and a cc-by-sa 2.5 image on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/iluvrhinestones/297039837/
My personal favorite is the first. -- SiobhanHansa 15:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Gosh. Inspite the fact that the first picture Image:Helen Sjöholm.jpg is a "nice" dress, it only shows a typically dress from 1950! It misses the classic strong line. --Herrick 08:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Statement about men's attire
The statement that men may wear a dark suit to a semi-formal event is incorrect and should be removed. See Semi formal. In addition, it's off-topic in this article. Toddst1 (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
www.fashionable-advice.clothingforstyle.com
Hi Leila, My apologies for the second undo, but I've removed the material you added from your website. While I can see you're trying to constructively contribute and you've solved the copyright problems, that material fails Wikipedia:Verifiability as WP:SPS. Bluntly, just because you published it on your website, doesn't make it true. Beyond that, the material is more of a style guide which we don't do per WP:HOWTO. While many folks think that type of info would be useful on Wikipedia, we have made a decision not to include that type of material. I hope this helps. Toddst1 (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Toddst1, thanks for your notes. I'm still thinking about expanding of this article. This time I divided to consult with you first. I'm thinking about leaving History section with a reference to "da Cruz, Elyssa. "Dressing for the Cocktail Hour". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000". As for rest of my content, I'm thinking about External Links section. Is such modification acceptable? WBR Leila Lynch 21:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds like a great idea. Let me know if you need help with the Wikipedia:Citation templates. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)