Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/UltraBot: Difference between revisions
→Discussion: progress? |
The Earwig (talk | contribs) →Discussion: note |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Any progress? [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) |
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Any progress? [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
* User hasn't edited en.wiki since mid-November, although they are active at ml.wiki. I [http://ml.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=%E0%B4%89%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%AF%E0%B5%8B%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A4%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%B5%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%A8%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B1%E0%B5%86_%E0%B4%B8%E0%B4%82%E0%B4%B5%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%A6%E0%B4%82%3AJunaidpv&action=historysubmit&diff=531074&oldid=530864 left a note] on their talk page at ml; hopefully they will come here to comment. If they don't finish the trial soon, I would consider expiring this request. — [[User:The Earwig|<span style="color:#008800">''The''</span>]] [[User talk:The Earwig|<span style="color:#004400">''Earwig''</span>]] [[Special:EmailUser/The Earwig|<span style="color:black">@</span>]] 17:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:41, 13 December 2009
Operator: Junaidpv
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: standard pywikipedia framework
Function overview: interwiki purpose
Edit period(s): few edits per day
Estimated number of pages affected:
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Not yet
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No
Function details: Just interwiki only
Discussion
Is this running on any other wikis? If so, ENWP allows Global Bots for interwiki-only work and does not require seperate approval. Q T C 07:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Currently, this bot doesn't have a global flag. --Erwin (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- that is what I have tried before, but because of this bot only started few weeks ago, they rejected the request :( --UltraBot (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Side note: You should be editing as you, not the bot. Q T C 12:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- ok --Junaid (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- You might look at resolving Monoicous/Monoecious. I sorted it out some months back but it seems other wikis keep re-adding bad links. Rich Farmbrough, 09:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
- Well I went to see what had happened and fixed it. But it would be good if we could keep it fixed without using {{nobots}} on the article, because all the other wiki';s have incorrect links (when it goes wrong). Rich Farmbrough, 10:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
- You might look at resolving Monoicous/Monoecious. I sorted it out some months back but it seems other wikis keep re-adding bad links. Rich Farmbrough, 09:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
- Do you need a bot flag if it's a few edits a day? Rich Farmbrough, 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
- few edits means up to what number? here i am going to do with interwiki only. some day it may do more edits, but most of time it will do few edits only --195.229.235.38 (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC) really sorry for not being logged in while leaving last comment, just now only I noticed it :( --Junaid (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Mr.Z-man 00:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. Any progress? Anomie⚔ 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- User hasn't edited en.wiki since mid-November, although they are active at ml.wiki. I left a note on their talk page at ml; hopefully they will come here to comment. If they don't finish the trial soon, I would consider expiring this request. — The Earwig @ 17:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)