Talk:Test–retest: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Merge== |
==Merge== |
||
[[Test-retest]] and [[repeatability]] seem to essentially cover the same topic.[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] ([[User talk:Mikael Häggström|talk]]) 06:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
[[Test-retest]] and [[repeatability]] seem to essentially cover the same topic.[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] ([[User talk:Mikael Häggström|talk]]) 06:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
I believe it is important to note that "repeatability" is a defined term. It belongs neither to [[Test-retest]] or to [[Scientific Method]] (where it is definitionally related but not shown now), but to both. How do we handle providing definitions in Wikipedia? --[[User:Liftoph|Liftoph]] ([[User talk:Liftoph|talk]]) 16:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:01, 18 January 2010
Statistics Disambig‑class | |||||||
|
Mathematics Disambig‑class | |||||||
|
Quantify?
What is the best way to quantify test-retest reliability? correlation coefficient? something else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.112.151.175 (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Merge
Test-retest and repeatability seem to essentially cover the same topic.Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC) I believe it is important to note that "repeatability" is a defined term. It belongs neither to Test-retest or to Scientific Method (where it is definitionally related but not shown now), but to both. How do we handle providing definitions in Wikipedia? --Liftoph (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)