Non-jury trial: Difference between revisions
m remove Erik9bot category,outdated, tag and general fixes, added orphan tag |
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + other fixes using AWB (10065) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{multiple issues| |
|||
{{Unreferenced |
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} |
||
{{Orphan|date=December 2009}} |
{{Orphan|date=December 2009}} |
||
}} |
|||
In a '''non-jury trial''' the fact-finder is one or more professional [[judge]]s rather than a [[jury]] of the [[defendant]]'s 'peers'. |
In a '''non-jury trial''' the fact-finder is one or more professional [[judge]]s rather than a [[jury]] of the [[defendant]]'s 'peers'. |
Revision as of 16:48, 28 March 2014
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
In a non-jury trial the fact-finder is one or more professional judges rather than a jury of the defendant's 'peers'.
In common law jurisdictions, all trials in equity, of petty criminal offenses and violations, and of small claims at law are non-jury trials, also known as bench trials, held before a single judge. In all other cases, whether criminal charges and civil claims at law, the defendant may also waive a jury and be subject to a bench trial.
In civil law systems where juries are unknown, all trials are held before a judge or panel of judges.
Judges in non-jury trials serve dual roles, ruling on applicable law, including the rules of evidence and procedure, and as finders of fact. While lay juries are not trusted to be exposed to prejudicial inadmissible evidence, which may be grounds for a mistrial, judges in a non-jury trial may review all proffered materials while excluding from consideration any evidence that they determine to be inadmissible under the law.