Jump to content

File talk:Human anatomy.jpg: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:
== Why no body hair? ==
== Why no body hair? ==


It's ridiculous and rather pathetic that neither of these models have any body hair. All Humans have hair on their pubic regions and underarm area. As a result of this omission the picture is a reflection of cultural values, not a depiction of Human anatomy, and should be changed.
It's ridiculous and rather pathetic that neither of these models have any body hair. All Humans have hair on their pubic regions and underarm area. As a result of this omission the picture is a reflection of cultural values, not a depiction of Human anatomy, and should be changed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.41.183.0|82.41.183.0]] ([[User talk:82.41.183.0|talk]]) 18:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 18:33, 7 January 2010

I know it says don't use this to request corrections to the image, but I don't know where else to do it.

The singular of "calves" is "calf"; the image says "calve". Although I could probably change it myself, I'd rather leave it to Wikipedia experts.

Thanks.

Callypenny (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Callypenny[reply]

Problem solved.--Lamilli (talk) 10:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Female in standard position as well

what is in the way of getting a picture of a female in standard anatomical position as well. In the current picture the woman's knees are bent and that shifts her spine and it just doesn't represent it correctly

andyzweb (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Why no body hair?

It's ridiculous and rather pathetic that neither of these models have any body hair. All Humans have hair on their pubic regions and underarm area. As a result of this omission the picture is a reflection of cultural values, not a depiction of Human anatomy, and should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.183.0 (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]