User talk:Trulyequal1: Difference between revisions
heh.... he shoots, he misses! - still gigantic boobs can be tricky to tell apart ;-) |
m →Account Status: a --> o |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Account Status== |
==Account Status== |
||
This would seem to be an |
This would seem to be an odd sort of [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride_2#Comment_by_Prodego_.28et_al..29|arbitrator's sock]]. [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] ([[User talk:Privatemusings|talk]]) 23:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Sockmaster == |
== Sockmaster == |
||
Revision as of 23:56, 20 January 2010
Account Status
This would seem to be an odd sort of arbitrator's sock. Privatemusings (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Sockmaster
Is this account controlled and operated by a single Arbitrator, or by more than one? What is/are the name(s)? DuncanHill (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Contacting Arbcom
The admin who deleted the userpage suggested contacting Arbcom. They have been contacted, and apart from an indication by one Arb that this is may be a role account operated by all Arbs, no straightforward answer has been received. DuncanHill (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
let's be civil
I see my reply to Duncan was reverted, the rather embarrassing 'welcome' was restored, and Hersfold (for it is he) suggested in his edit summary that I was being less than civil. It's possible he considered my saying the folk behind this account 'were being gigantic boobs' was uncivil - I don't really think it is, and I think Hersfold was being a gigantic boob in summarily reverting my post, and deleting the userpage - usually an elephant in a room doesn't fit well under a carpet ;-) Privatemusings (talk) 22:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- ps. to my mind, this is now quite clearly a 'discussion internal to the project' - isn't there some ruling or other related to using sock accounts in such contexts? Privatemusings (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)