Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:15, 13 February 2010

Video games: Nintendo Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (4 participants)
Redout (video game) (8 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Do NOT delete. The game has been officially announced and has a (tenative) release date. Faythoffenrir (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is "officially announced" and has a release date doesn't mean it can have an article. Just wait until more information is released. Once we have enough information to make a good sized article, then it can be separate. Why does it matter if the information is here or merged on another page? It still is covered somewhere, and the article WILL be made when more is released about it. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 16:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Might I suggest we ponder a different name to call the article?., I (and maybe others) keep confusing this with twilight princess. Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Legend of Zelda (2010 video game). That's what the image says and that's when it's supposed to be released, as good as any other (and at this point in time as relevant as anything else). Someone another 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good. Ottawa4ever (talk) 13:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy=Great fairy in Wind Waker?

That fairy (in the concept art) just looks too much like the one in Wind Waker. Coincidence? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudeaga (talk • contribs) 20:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:14, 13 February 2010 edit Dudeaga (talk \| contribs) 21 edits →Fairy=Great fairy in Wind Waker?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:15, 13 February 2010 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,554,757 edits m Signing comment by Dudeaga - "→Fairy=Great fairy in Wind Waker?: new section" Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Fairy=Great fairy in Wind Waker? ==		== Fairy=Great fairy in Wind Waker? ==

	That fairy (in the concept art) just looks too much like the one in Wind Waker. Coincidence?		That fairy (in the concept art) just looks too much like the one in Wind Waker. Coincidence? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dudeaga\|Dudeaga]] ([[User talk:Dudeaga\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dudeaga\|contribs]]) 20:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->