Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meile Rockefeller: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
:{{la|Meile Rockefeller}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meile Rockefeller|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February |
:{{la|Meile Rockefeller}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meile Rockefeller|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 25#{{anchorencode:Meile Rockefeller}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meile Rockefeller}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
||
:({{findsources|Meile Rockefeller}}) |
:({{findsources|Meile Rockefeller}}) |
||
This was an unsourced BLP and I've added a source to deal with that problem, but I don't think Ms. Rockefeller meets the criteria of the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. She's mentioned in a couple of 1980s stories about real estate, and her biggest press splash came when she was arrested for protesting the Rockefeller Drug Laws. It's one incident and I don't think that's sufficient to warrant an article, and obviously her notability is not inherited from her more famous relatives. [[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 00:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
This was an unsourced BLP and I've added a source to deal with that problem, but I don't think Ms. Rockefeller meets the criteria of the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. She's mentioned in a couple of 1980s stories about real estate, and her biggest press splash came when she was arrested for protesting the Rockefeller Drug Laws. It's one incident and I don't think that's sufficient to warrant an article, and obviously her notability is not inherited from her more famous relatives. [[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 00:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::A merge was actually my first thought, but that article is pretty short (lots of organizations have organized against the Rockefeller laws and we should really have a whole section on opposing/protesting them) so it may not work. Still I'm definitely open to that possibility, particularly if we can expand the target article, but I'm fairly convinced she should not have her own article. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 02:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
::A merge was actually my first thought, but that article is pretty short (lots of organizations have organized against the Rockefeller laws and we should really have a whole section on opposing/protesting them) so it may not work. Still I'm definitely open to that possibility, particularly if we can expand the target article, but I'm fairly convinced she should not have her own article. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 02:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - Notability is not inherited, retrieve whatever content is relevant to past it elsewhere (where it is relevant). -[[User:RobertMel|RobertMel]] ([[User talk:RobertMel|talk]]) 19:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Notability is not inherited, retrieve whatever content is relevant to past it elsewhere (where it is relevant). -[[User:RobertMel|RobertMel]] ([[User talk:RobertMel|talk]]) 19:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small>([[User:X!|<span style="color:gray">X!</span>]] · [[User talk:X!|<span style="color:gray">talk</span>]]) · [[Swatch Internet Time|@952]] · </small> 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Articles for deletion|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}} |
Revision as of 21:50, 25 February 2010
- Meile Rockefeller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was an unsourced BLP and I've added a source to deal with that problem, but I don't think Ms. Rockefeller meets the criteria of the general notability guideline. She's mentioned in a couple of 1980s stories about real estate, and her biggest press splash came when she was arrested for protesting the Rockefeller Drug Laws. It's one incident and I don't think that's sufficient to warrant an article, and obviously her notability is not inherited from her more famous relatives. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 00:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge I think she's notable enough, but if not how about merging into the Rockefeller drug laws article? Her protesting arrest is the main source of her notability, so please at least merge if not keep. Vampyrecat (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- A merge was actually my first thought, but that article is pretty short (lots of organizations have organized against the Rockefeller laws and we should really have a whole section on opposing/protesting them) so it may not work. Still I'm definitely open to that possibility, particularly if we can expand the target article, but I'm fairly convinced she should not have her own article. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 02:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Notability is not inherited, retrieve whatever content is relevant to past it elsewhere (where it is relevant). -RobertMel (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @952 · 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)