User talk:Richboyliang

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vundo, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 04:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Vundo constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Vundo, you will be blocked from editing. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 01:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

It seems you're Disrupting wikipedia to make a point. Don't do that. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 01:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

As Wikipedia is not a self-help guide, your edits to add Vundo removal instructions will be removed as they were before. The editor removing them is shown in the log, and he explained his edit in the discussion page. sinneed (talk) 02:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Vundo, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Vundo&diff=251461845&oldid=248911360 - it is critical that you not do this again. sinneed (talk) 02:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Richboyliang

Hey, thanks for your message. Thanks for telling me about the situation. I understand your frustration about an another editor who may remove what you wrote without explaining his or her edits on the article's talk page. If someone keeps deleting what you wrote, you can start a discussion on the talk page of the other user, or if it seems that they want to edit war go ahead and find some arbitration with an administrator [[1]]. Hope that helps. Maxis ftw (talk) 08:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Σxplicit 00:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

RFB

Hi - I have reverted your self-nomination because it didn't comply with the procedure shown at WP:RFB. However, before you follow that procedure, can I strongly suggest that you review the criteria both for RFA and RFB on that page and determine if you think the community will be able to review you based on only 28 edits in your history.  7  05:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you indefinitely for this edit, as well the vandalism that you have been warned for before. To appeal your block, please add {{unblock|Your reason here}} to your user talk page. NW (Talk) 15:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richboyliang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know i got warnings but you can't just start off blocking me with a block for eternity. Besides, I won't do it again.

Decline reason:

I might believe you if there weren't a long history of abuse from your account. Impersonating another user is deserving of a block; the history makes it indefinite or at least long-term. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Richboyliang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well then please at least reduce the length of this block, I've been unable to edit for quite some time now.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Well then please at least reduce the length of this block, I've been unable to edit for quite some time now. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well then please at least reduce the length of this block, I've been unable to edit for quite some time now. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well then please at least reduce the length of this block, I've been unable to edit for quite some time now. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}