Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 346439892 by JohnInDC (talk) Please re-review the ironclad references provided . I will also contact FDIC for further proof. Tag: references removed |
|||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.--In view of the findings and declarations contained in subsection (a), it is the sense of the Congress that it should reaffirm that deposits up to the statutorily prescribed amount in federally insured depository institutions are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. |
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.--In view of the findings and declarations contained in subsection (a), it is the sense of the Congress that it should reaffirm that deposits up to the statutorily prescribed amount in federally insured depository institutions are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. |
||
While any final conclusion on this matter rests with the Attorney General of the United States and ultimately with the courts, it is our opinion that Title IX of CEBA merely represents an expression of the intent of Congress to support the FDIC's deposit insurance fund should the need arise. Title IX does not change any existing underlying law. It does not amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, nor does it or any other provision of CEBA alter the method by which the FDIC is funded. The FDIC continues to receive no government appropriations, and its funding continues to consist entirely of its income obtained from insurance assessments and from the return on investments made in government securities. In addition, the FDIC's statutory authority to borrow up to $3.0 billion from the Treasury remains unchanged. |
|||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
Revision as of 13:21, 26 February 2010
FDIC | |
Agency overview | |
---|---|
Formed | June 16, 1933 |
Jurisdiction | Federal government of the United States |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
Employees | 5,381 (2009, Q1)[1] |
Agency executives |
|
Website | www.fdic.gov |
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a United States government corporation created by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. It provides deposit insurance, which guarantees the safety of deposits in member banks, currently up to $250,000 per depositor per bank. The FDIC insures deposits at 8,195 institutions.[2] The FDIC also examines and supervises certain financial institutions for safety and soundness, performs certain consumer-protection functions, and manages banks in receiverships (failed banks).
Insured institutions are required to place signs at their place of business stating that "deposits are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government."[3] Since the start of FDIC insurance on January 1, 1934, no depositor has lost a single cent of insured funds as a result of a failure.[4]
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of the FDIC is the governing body of the FDIC. The Board is composed of five members, three appointed by the President of the United States with the consent of the United States Senate and two ex officio members. The three appointed members each serve six year terms. No more than three members of the Board may be of the same political affiliation. The President, with the consent of the Senate, also designates one of the appointed members as Chair of the Board, to serve a five year term, and one of the appointed members as Vice Chair of the Board, to also serve a five year term.
As of 2009, the current members of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation are:
- Sheila C. Bair - Chair of the Board
- Martin J. Gruenberg - Vice Chair of the Board
- Thomas J. Curry
- John C. Dugan - Comptroller of the Currency
- John E. Bowman - Acting Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision
History
Inception
During the 1930s, the US and the rest of the world experienced a severe economic contraction that is now called the Great Depression. In the US during the height of the Great Depression, the official unemployment rate was 25% and the stock market had declined 75% since 1929. Bank runs were common because there wasn't insurance on deposits at banks, and citizens ran the risk of losing the money that they had deposited if their bank failed.[5]
On June 16, 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Banking Act of 1933. This legislation:[5]
- Established the FDIC as a temporary government corporation
- Gave the FDIC authority to provide deposit insurance to banks
- Gave the FDIC the authority to regulate and supervise state nonmember banks
- Funded the FDIC with initial loans of $289 million through the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve
- Extended federal oversight to all commercial banks for the first time
- Separated commercial and investment banking (Glass-Steagall Act)
- Prohibited banks from paying interest on checking accounts
- Allowed national banks to branch statewide, if allowed by state law.
Historical insurance limits
- 1934 - $2,500
- 1935 - $5,000
- 1950 - $10,000
- 1966 - $15,000
- 1969 - $20,000
- 1974 - $40,000
- 1980 - $100,000
- 2008 - $250,000 (Temporary increase due to expire December 31, 2013)
The standard insurance amount of $250,000 per depositor is in effect through December 31, 2013. On January 1, 2014, the standard insurance amount will return to $100,000 per depositor for all account categories except IRAs and certain other retirement accounts, which will remain at $250,000 per depositor.[6]
S&L and bank crisis of the 1980s
Federal deposit insurance received its first large-scale test in the late 1980s and early 1990s during the savings and loan crisis (which also affected commercial banks and savings banks).
The brunt of the crisis fell upon a parallel institution, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), created to insure savings and loan institutions (S&Ls, also called thrifts). Due to a confluence of events, much of the S&L industry was insolvent, and many large banks were in trouble as well. The FSLIC became insolvent and merged into the FDIC. Thrifts are now overseen by the Office of Thrift Supervision, an agency that works closely with the FDIC and the Comptroller of the Currency. (Credit unions are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.) The primary legislative responses to the crisis were the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA).
This crisis cost taxpayers an estimated $150 billion to resolve.
Financial Crisis of 2008 and 2009
2008
As a result of the financial crisis in 2008, twenty-five U.S. banks became insolvent and were taken over by the FDIC.[7]. However, during that year, the largest bank failure in terms of dollar value occurred on September 26, 2008 when Washington Mutual experienced a 10-day bank run on its deposits.[8][9]
2009
On July 31, 2009, the FDIC launched its Legacy Loans Program (LLP). This initiative is aimed at helping banks rid their balance sheets of toxic assets so they can raise new capital and increase lending.[10]
On August 14, 2009, Bloomberg reported that more than 150 publicly traded U.S. lenders had nonperforming loans above 5% of their total holdings. This is important because former regulators say that this is the level that can wipe out a bank's equity and threaten its survival. While this ratio doesn't always lead to bank failures if the banks in question have raised additional capital and have properly established reserves for the bad debt, it is an important indicator for future FDIC activity.[11]
On August 21, 2009, the 2nd largest bank in Texas became insolvent and was taken over by BBVA of Spain. This is the first foreign company to buy a failed bank during the credit crisis of 2008 and 2009.[12] This transaction alone cost the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund $3 Billion.
On August 27, 2009, the FDIC increased the number of troubled banks to 416 in the second quarter. That number compares to 305 just three months earlier.[13] At the end of the third quarter that number jumped to 552[14].
As of December 19, a total of 140 banks had become insolvent in 2009.[15] This is the largest number of bank failures in a year since 1992, when 179 institutions failed.[16]
As of the end of the third quarter 2009, the insurance fund that covers more than $4.5 trillion in deposits had a negative balance of $8.2 billion.[14] As of the end of the fourth quarter 2009, the fund's balance was negative $20.9 billion. [17]
FDIC Funds
Former Funds
Between 1989 and 2006, there were two separate FDIC funds — the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF), and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF). The latter was established after the savings & loans crisis of the 1980s. The existence of two separate funds for the same purpose led to banks attempting to shift from one fund to another, depending on the benefits each could provide. In the 1990s, SAIF premiums were at one point five times higher than BIF premiums; several banks attempted to qualify for the BIF, with some merging with institutions qualified for the BIF to avoid the higher premiums of the SAIF. This drove up the BIF premiums as well, resulting in a situation where both funds were charging higher premiums than necessary.[18]
Then Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan was a critic of the system, saying that "We are, in effect, attempting to use government to enforce two different prices for the same item– namely, government-mandated deposit insurance. Such price differences only create efforts by market participants to arbitrage the difference." Greenspan proposed "to end this game and merge SAIF and BIF".[19]
Deposit Insurance Fund
In February, 2006, President George W. Bush signed into law the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 ("FDIRA") and a related conforming amendments act. The FDIRA contains technical and conforming changes to implement deposit insurance reform, as well as a number of study and survey requirements. Among the highlights of this law was merging the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). This change was made effective March 31, 2006. The FDIC maintains the DIF by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium. The amount each institution is assessed is based both on the balance of insured deposits as well as on the degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund.
Bank failures typically represent a cost to the DIF because FDIC, as receiver of the failed institution, must liquidate assets that have declined substantially in value while at the same time making good on the institution's deposit obligations.
A March 2008 memorandum to the FDIC Board of Directors shows a 2007 year-end Deposit Insurance Fund balance of about $52.4 billion, which represented a reserve ratio of 1.22% of its exposure to insured deposits totaling about $4.29 trillion. The 2008 year-end insured deposits were projected to reach about $4.42 trillion with the reserve growing to $55.2 billion, a ratio of 1.25%.[20] As of June 2008, the DIF had a balance of $45.2 billion.[21] However, 9 months later, in March, 2009, the DIF fell to $13 billion.[22] That was the lowest total since September, 1993[22] and represented a reserve ratio of 0.27% of its exposure to insured deposits totaling about $4.83 trillion.[23] In the second quarter of 2009, the FDIC imposed an emergency fee aimed at raising $5.6 billion to replenish the DIF.[24] However, Saxo Bank Research reported that after Aug 7th further bank failures had reduced the DIF balance to $648.1 million.[25] FDIC-estimated costs of assuming additional failed banks on Aug 14th exceeded that amount.[citation needed] The FDIC announced its intent, on September 29, 2009 to asses the banks in advance for three years of premiums in an effort to avoid DIF insolvency. The FDIC revised its estimated costs of bank failures to about $100 billion over the next four years, an increase of $30 billion from the $70 billion estimate of earlier in 2009. The FDIC board voted to require insured banks to prepay $45 billion in premiums to replenish the fund. News media reported that the prepayment move would be inadequate to assure the financial stabiity of the FDIC insurance fund. The FDIC elected to request the prepayment so that the banks could recognize the expense over three years, instead of drawing down banks' statutory capital abruptly, at the time of the assessment.[26] The fund is mandated by law to keep a balance equivalent to 1.15 percent of insured deposits.[26] As of June 30, 2008, the insured banks held approximately $7,025 billion in total deposits, though not all of those are insured.[27]
The DIF's reserves are not the only cash resources available to the FDIC: in addition to the $10 billion in the DIF as of August, 2009; the FDIC has $22 billion of cash and U.S. Treasury securities held as of June 30, 2009 and has the ability to borrow up to $500 billion from the Treasury. The FDIC can also demand special assessments from banks as it did in the second quarter of 2009.[28][29]
"Full Faith and Credit"
In light of apparent systemic risks facing the banking system, the adequacy of FDIC's financial backing has come into question. Beyond the funds in the Deposit Insurance Fund above and the FDIC's power to charge insurance premia, FDIC insurance is additionally assured by the Federal government. According to the FDIC.gov website (as of January 2009), "FDIC deposit insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government". This means that the resources of the United States government stand behind FDIC-insured depositors."[30] The statutory basis for this claim is included in numerous laws and revisions to the law. In March 1982, both houses of Congress passed a non-binding resolution which expressed their sentiment that if the need were to arise, the Federal Government supported the deposit insurance with full faith and credit. Subsequently, in 1987, a law known as Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 (CEBA) was signed into law by the President. In that law was the following passage:
TITLE IX–FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF FEDERALLY INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS
SEC. 901. REAFFIRMATION OF SECURITY OF FUNDS DEPOSITED IN FEDERALLY INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.
(a) FINDINGS.--The Congress finds and declares that--
(1) since the 1930's, the American people have relied upon Federal Deposit insurance to ensure the safety and security of their funds in federally insured depository institutions; and
(2) the safety security [sic] of such funds is an essential element of the American financial system.
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.--In view of the findings and declarations contained in subsection (a), it is the sense of the Congress that it should reaffirm that deposits up to the statutorily prescribed amount in federally insured depository institutions are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
In 1987, after the passage of CEBA, an advisory opinion written for the FDIC which took into consideration CEBA and the non-binding resolution of 1982, stated that any decision as to what CEBA provided in the way of full faith and credit backing of the US had to be decided by the Courts. However, the advisory panel did provide an opinion on its feelings of the "sense of congress" language in CEBA.
In 1989, the President signed into law yet another comprehensive package called Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. In passing the law, President Bush, Sr. at the time said the following [2]:
And in its place a new agency will operate as part of the Treasury Department, ensuring the taxpayers' interests will always come first. And at the same time, a completely new insurance fund will protect deposits in thrift institutions. The obligations of the new fund, called Savings Association Insurance Fund, SAIF, will be fully guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States
FIRREA amended the deposit insurance by adding the following:
(d) FULL FAITH AND CREDIT.--The full faith and credit of the United States is pledged to the payment of any obligation issued after the date of the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 by the Corporation, with respect to both principal and interest, if--
(1) the principal amount of such obligation is stated in the obligation; and
(2) the term to maturity or the date of maturity of such obligation is stated in the obligation.
[Codified to 12 U.S.C. 1825(d)]
see [3] It should be noted that "obligations" as defined STRICTLY for paragraph #5's puposes of the ACT (which explicitly spells out the MAXIMUM LIMITATION of outstanding obligations), excludes deposit guarantees (for paragraph #5's purposes), but it does NOT exclude deposit guarantees for the purposes of the law in general -- only for purposes of Paragraph #5 because the deposit guarantee is NOT limited outside of the statutory limits put in place by the FDIC
(5) MAXIMUM AMOUNT LIMITATION ON OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS.1 --Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act, the Corporation may not issue or incur any obligation, if, after issuing or incurring the obligation, the aggregate amount of obligations of the Deposit Insurance Fund, respectively, outstanding would exceed the sum of--
(A) the amount of cash or the equivalent of cash held by the Deposit Insurance Fund, respectively;
(B) the amount which is equal to 90 percent of the Corporation's estimate of the fair market value of assets held by the Deposit Insurance Fund, respectively, other than assets described in subparagraph (A); and
(C) the total of the amounts authorized to be borrowed from the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 14(a).
(6) OBLIGATION DEFINED.--
(A) IN GENERAL.--For purposes of paragraph (5), the term "obligation" includes--
(i) any guarantee issued by the Corporation, other than deposit guarantees;
(ii) any amount borrowed pursuant to section 14; and
(iii) any other obligation for which the Corporation has a direct or contingent liability to pay any amount.
Sheila Bair reiterated the full faith and credit guarantee of the deposit insurance and goes onto claim the FDIC is the government: [4]
We are the government and our insurance guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. In short, we cannot run out of money
There are also laws mandating that the FDIC clearly state that the deposit insurance is guaranteed by full faith and credit of the government. See [5]
(a) Representations of deposit insurance
(B) Statement to be included Each sign required under subparagraph (A) shall include a statement that insured deposits are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.
Insurance requirements
To receive this benefit, member banks must follow certain liquidity and reserve requirements. Banks are classified in five groups according to their risk-based capital ratio:
- Well capitalized: 10% or higher
- Adequately capitalized: 8% or higher
- Undercapitalized: less than 8%
- Significantly undercapitalized: less than 6%
- Critically undercapitalized: less than 2%
When a bank becomes undercapitalized the FDIC issues a warning to the bank. When the number drops below 6% the FDIC can change management and force the bank to take other corrective action. When the bank becomes critically undercapitalized the FDIC declares the bank insolvent and can take over management of the bank.
Resolution of insolvent banks
The two most common methods employed by FDIC in cases of insolvency or illiquidity are:
- Purchase and Assumption Method (P&A), in which all deposits (liabilities) are assumed by an open bank, which also purchases some or all of the failed bank's loans (assets). Other failed assets are auctioned online, primarily through The Debt Exchange and First Financial Network.[31]
- Payout Method, in which insured deposits are paid by the FDIC, which attempts to recover its payments by liquidating the receivership estate of the failed bank. These are straight deposit payoffs and are only executed if the FDIC doesn’t receive a bid for a P&A transaction or for an insured deposit transfer transaction. In a straight deposit payoff, no liabilities are assumed and no assets are purchased by another institution. Also, the FDIC determines the insured amount for each depositor and pays that amount to him or her. In calculating each customer’s total deposit amount, the FDIC includes all the interest accrued up to the date of failure under the contractual terms of the depositor’s account.[32]
FDIC-insured products
FDIC deposit insurance covers deposit accounts, which, by the FDIC definition, include:
- demand deposit accounts (checking accounts), and negotiable order of withdrawal accounts (NOW accounts, i.e., savings accounts that have check-writing privileges)
- savings deposit accounts (savings accounts), and money market deposit accounts (MMDAs, i.e., higher-interest savings accounts subject to check-writing restrictions)
- time deposit accounts including certificates of deposit (CDs)
- outstanding cashier's checks, interest checks, and other negotiable instruments drawn on the accounts of the bank.
- accounts denominated in foreign currencies [33]
Accounts at different banks are insured separately. All branches of a bank are considered to form a single bank. Also, an Internet bank that is part of a brick and mortar bank is not considered to be a separate bank, even if the name differs. Non-US citizens are also covered by FDIC insurance.[33]
The FDIC publishes a guide entitled Your Insured Deposits, which sets forth the general contours of FDIC deposit insurance, and addresses common questions asked by bank customers about deposit insurance.[34]
Items not insured by FDIC
Only the above types of accounts are insured. Some types of uninsured products, even if purchased through a covered financial institution, are:[34]
- Stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and money funds
- The Securities Investor Protection Corporation, a separate institution chartered by Congress, provides protection against the loss of many types of such securities in the event of a brokerage failure, but not against losses on the investments.
- Further, as of September 19, 2008, the US Treasury is offering an optional insurance program for money market funds, which guarantees the value of the assets.[35]
- Investments backed by the U.S. government, such as US Treasury securities
- The contents of safe deposit boxes.
- Even though the word deposit appears in the name, under federal law a safe deposit box is not a deposit account – it's a well-secured storage space rented by an institution to a customer.
- Losses due to theft or fraud at the institution.
- These situations are often covered by special insurance policies that banking institutions buy from private insurance companies.
- Accounting errors.
- In these situations, there may be remedies for consumers under state contract law, the Uniform Commercial Code, and some federal regulations, depending on the type of transaction.
- Insurance and annuity products, such as life, auto and homeowner's insurance.
See also
- FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework
- Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
- National Credit Union Administration
- Too Big to Fail policy
- List of largest U.S. bank failures
- 2008–2010 bank failures in the United States
- List of acquired or bankrupt United States banks in the late 2000s financial crisis
Notes
- ^ [1]
- ^ "fdic press release". Retrieved 2009-10-20.
- ^ 12 U.S.C. section 1828(a)(1)(B). Accessible online from Cornell law: US CODE: Title 12,1828. Regulations governing insured depository institutions
- ^ FDIC. "FDIC: Who is the FDIC?". Retrieved 2009-07-24.
- ^ a b http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/learning/when/1930s.html
- ^ FDIC. "FDIC: Deposit Insurance Fact Sheet". Retrieved 2009-09-01.
- ^ FDIC. "Failed Bank List". Retrieved 2009-06-27.
- ^ Shen, Linda (2008-09-26). "WaMu's Bank Split From Holding Company, Sparing FDIC". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2008-09-27.
- ^ Dash, Eric (2008-04-07). "$5 Billion Said to Be Near for WaMu". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-27.
- ^ FDIC. "Legacy Loans Program". Retrieved 2009-07-31.
- ^ Ari Levy. "Toxic Loans Topping 5% May Push 150 Banks to Point of No Return". Retrieved 2009-08-14.
- ^ http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/21/news/companies/banks.invasion.fortune/?postversion=2009082115
- ^ http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2009/pr09153.html
- ^ a b Eric Dash (November 24, 2009). "As Bank Failures Rise, F.D.I.C. Fund Falls Into Red". The New York Times. p. B4. Retrieved 2009-11-28.
- ^ FDIC. "FDIC: Press Releases". Retrieved 2009-08-08.
- ^ FDIC. "FDIC Trends, March, 2009" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-07-10.
- ^ "Banking sector shows profits, but below trends: FDIC". AFP. February 23, 2010. p. 1. Retrieved 2010-2-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Sicilia, David B. & Cruikshank, Jeffrey L. (2000). The Greenspan Effect, pp. 96–97. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-134919-7.
- ^ Sicilia & Cruikshank, pp. 97–98.
- ^ http://www.fdic.gov/deposit/insurance/assessments/assessment_rates_2008.pdf "Assessment Rates for 2008," p. 11. Retrieved on 2008-08-11.
- ^ Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) Report to the Board: DIF Balance Sheet - Third Quarter 2008
- ^ a b Ari Levy and Margaret Chadbourn (July 10, 2009). "Bank of Wyoming Seized; 53rd U.S. Failure This Year (Update1)". Retrieved 2009-07-10.
- ^ http://www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/stats/2009mar/fdic.pdf "FDIC Statistics at a Glance." Retrieved on 2008-08-11.
- ^ Ari Levy and Margaret Chadbourn. "Lender Failures Reach 64 as Georgia Shuts Security Bank's Units". Retrieved 2009-07-224.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Bagger-Sjöbäck, Robin (August 12, 2009). "FDIC's Shrinking Deposit Insurance Fund – A Testimony of Current Accounting Standards". Saxo Bank Research. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
- ^ a b Associated Press (September 29, 2009). "FDIC Insurance Plan Is No Long-Term Solution". New York Times. Retrieved September 29, 2009.
- ^ "Deposits of all FDIC-Insured Institutions, National Totals* by Asset Size: Data as of June 30, 2008". Summary of Deposits. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Retrieved October 3, 2009.
- ^ "Banks Tapped to Bolster FDIC Resources: FDIC Board Approves Proposed Rule to Seek Prepayment of Assessments". Press Release. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. September 29, 2009:. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ "FDIC Extends Restoration Plan: Imposes Special Assessment". Press Release. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. February 27, 2009. Retrieved October 5, 2009.
- ^ "FDIC: Symbol of Confidence for 75 Years". Retrieved 2009-01-16.
- ^ FDIC Website (accessed June 17, 2009)
- ^ http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/reshandbook/ch4payos.pdf
- ^ a b http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/2000-5400.html#2000part330.3
- ^ a b http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn.html
- ^ Henriques, Diana B. (2008-09-19). "Treasury to Guarantee Money Market Funds". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-20.