User:RobertMel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Reminders== |
==Reminders== |
||
*Drafting something to assess the notability of GNU softwares. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Notability_of_free_open_source_software] |
*Drafting something to assess the notability of GNU softwares. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Notability_of_free_open_source_software] |
||
*Something about compagnies notability. |
|||
Revision as of 16:06, 2 March 2010
RobertMel (talk) 02:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD
AfD has to maintain some predictablity of the votes by constructing precedents so that the encyclopedicity of Wikipedia is achievable.
My moto
After checking the AfDs for a very long time, it is my opinion that nearly all filled AfDs submitted with good intentions, particularly involving WP:BIO and WP:BLP are either strongly justifiable or if not, at the very least merge materials.
Reminders
- Drafting something to assess the notability of GNU softwares. [1]
- Something about compagnies notability.