Talk:Lists of scientists: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:16, 15 September 2010

Disambiguation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

I think it would be great to have more regional categorizations just like the 'Scottish Scientists' section. Maybe broken down like this?...

Do we need a general "List of scientists" and lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc. Can this be disaggregated and deleted ? dml

"Scientists" is way too broad and is therefore useless (lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc are fine though). This page is as useful as a list of authors would be. --mav

Done, the list has been disaggregated to the specific categories. dml

Coolness - nice work. --mav

List of inventors? List of jurists?!

Sorry, maybe I'm missing something here, but why are inventors on this list, they surely would be closer to Engineers rather than scientists? Also, jurists? Why are they here?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.132.162 (talk) 12:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC) conzere wos ere 2k8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.4.116 (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion?

I proposed this for deletion with the reason: Page is completely useless as-is, because of staggeringly poor world coverage and even if it was comprehensive it is not clear that it would be notable. It has basically been a target of vandals for at least the last year and shows no signs of going anywhere. Can someone explain what the point of this article is supposed to be. This really seems like it should be a category, what's the article here? Thanks, — sligocki (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Sorry, maybe I'm missing something here, but why are inventors on this list, they surely would be closer to Engineers rather than scientists? Also, jurists? Why are they here?!  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.18.132.162|82.18.132.162]] ([[User talk:82.18.132.162|talk]]) 12:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 conzere  wos ere 2k8  <span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.3.4.116|92.3.4.116]] ([[User talk:92.3.4.116|talk]]) 15:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Deletion? ==
+I proposed this for deletion with the reason: Page is completely useless as-is, because of staggeringly poor world coverage and even if it was comprehensive it is not clear that it would be notable. It has basically been a target of vandals for at least the last year and shows no signs of going anywhere. Can someone explain what the point of this article is supposed to be. This really seems like it should be a category, what's the article here? Thanks, —&nbsp;[[User:sligocki|sligocki]] ([[User talk:sligocki|talk]]) 03:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)