Template talk:WikiProject Visual arts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:08, 30 March 2010

missing C-class category

{{editprotected}} The template is not evaluating "c" as a category. As per discussion on the project page this should be corrected. The missing code appears to be

 |c|C=[[Category:C-Class visual arts articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Thanks Enki H. (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --- RockMFR 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance parameter

Should this not have a field for "importance", as in Template:WikiProject Pornography, and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? Ty 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. Johnbod (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 :Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 ::There is a very useful model for guidance here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment]], which could be adapted. '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
+:::It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)