Talk:2010 Nuclear Security Summit: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Why is the Schedule Section completely devoted to only detailing the US president's schedule? Wouldn't it be better if some other countries schedules were included? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JackRendar|JackRendar]] ([[User talk:JackRendar|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JackRendar|contribs]]) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Why is the Schedule Section completely devoted to only detailing the US president's schedule? Wouldn't it be better if some other countries schedules were included? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JackRendar|JackRendar]] ([[User talk:JackRendar|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JackRendar|contribs]]) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:A table could be added if anyone were to provide a schedule with such information. If you have one, feel more than happy to add it.--[[Special:Contributions/76.213.221.152|76.213.221.152]] ([[User talk:76.213.221.152|talk]]) 15:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) |
:A table could be added if anyone were to provide a schedule with such information. If you have one, feel more than happy to add it.--[[Special:Contributions/76.213.221.152|76.213.221.152]] ([[User talk:76.213.221.152|talk]]) 15:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:: I added most of the schedule information as I could find it. I was aware as I added it that it seemed to be very Obama-centered but I could not find further information easily. It was definitely not my intention for it to be US-centric. ''Please'' do add more schedule information if you find it. —[[User:Diiscool|Diiscool]] ([[User talk:Diiscool|talk]]) 15:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:44, 14 April 2010
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
International relations Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A news item involving 2010 Nuclear Security Summit was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 April 2010. |
Title
There is a planned summit in South Korea in 2 years. Would 2010 Nuclear Security Summit be a better title for this article? --BrokenSphereMsg me 23:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- The article for the 2012 summit has been created as well at: Nuclear Security Summit (2012). To me, it's "six of one, half a dozen of another" to have the year at the beginning. Plus, 2010 Nuclear Security Summit is a redirect to this article so it will get people here.
- So, to summarize, we currently have:
- Nuclear Security Summit (2010)
- Nuclear Security Summit (2012)
My vote is Keep as is.—Diiscool (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral. On second thought, looking at what has been done with Commons:Category:2010 Nuclear Security Summit and a number of other conferences and summits, I don't mind if someone moves this article—well, switches this article—with "2010 Nuclear Security Summit" (but don't forget to do 2012 Nuclear Security Summit too). —Diiscool (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Schedule Info
Why is the Schedule Section completely devoted to only detailing the US president's schedule? Wouldn't it be better if some other countries schedules were included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackRendar (talk • contribs) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- A table could be added if anyone were to provide a schedule with such information. If you have one, feel more than happy to add it.--76.213.221.152 (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added most of the schedule information as I could find it. I was aware as I added it that it seemed to be very Obama-centered but I could not find further information easily. It was definitely not my intention for it to be US-centric. Please do add more schedule information if you find it. —Diiscool (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)