Jump to content

Talk:Vere Chappell: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vchappell (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
wp
Line 1: Line 1:

{{philosophy|philosopher=yes|importance=low|contemporary=yes|mind=yes|metaphysics=yes|class=stub}}

== Not COI ==
Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. [[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. [[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:01, 9 May 2010

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Mind / Contemporary Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of mind
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy

Not COI

Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. Vchappell (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]