Jump to content

User talk:Everton Dasent: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blocked: Unblock reasons
Line 79: Line 79:
I warned you earlier not to edit-war to retain clearly unsuitable language and editorial commentary in {{la|Peter Holmes à Court}}. Because you have ignored this warning, I am blocking you from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit-warring and disregard for [[WP:BLP|the biographies of living persons policy]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 00:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I warned you earlier not to edit-war to retain clearly unsuitable language and editorial commentary in {{la|Peter Holmes à Court}}. Because you have ignored this warning, I am blocking you from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit-warring and disregard for [[WP:BLP|the biographies of living persons policy]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 00:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


{{unblock|I am the victim of bullying and [[wheel warring]] by an editor with more rights than I. The page in question was fully referenced with quotes from verifiable sources and very little editorial. Several sections have been removed altogether because a couple of editors don't like the facts}} [[User:Edasent|Edasent]] ([[User talk:Edasent#top|talk]]) 12:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|I am the victim of bullying and [[wheel warring]] by an editor with more rights than I. The page in question was fully referenced with quotes from verifiable sources and very little editorial. Several sections have been removed altogether because a couple of editors don't like the facts|decline=You really need to familiarize yourself with [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:BLP]]. Your additions were almost certainly inappropriate, and your edit warring to maintain them was 100% inappropriate. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 14:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 14:12, 12 May 2010

Welcome

Hello Everton Dasent and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.
Getting Started
Getting help
The Commmunity
Policies and Guidelines
Things to do

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Peter Holmes à Court. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Also please read WP:BLP. ukexpat (talk) 15:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All of the material you removed was verifiable and referenced. It was not original research or personal analysis. You are in violation by deleting referenced material. All I did was to replace the referenced material which had be put in place by several editors. Please do not remove referenced material from Wikipedia. Edasent (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you did was litter the article with non-neutral words and phrases, in contravention of WP:NPOV and WP:BLP - I have reverted your edits again. – ukexpat (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

It is quite apparent that you are trying to change this article into something blatantly non-neutral by the use of tabloid language and over-weighting of negative material. It is not acceptable to use a Wikipedia biography to push your point-of-view of the subject. Please discuss the material you wish to introduce on the talk page of the article, so that the valid parts of it may be utilised in a neutral article. If you continue to edit the article in the manner in which you have been doing, I will prevent you from doing so, either by banning you from this topic (see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/BLP Special Enforcement) or blocking your account outright. CIreland (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how direct quotes from a properly referenced, researched book, not subject to litigation and still in print is not valid? The Firepower section which you removed is 90% quote from just such a source. Threatening to ban me for providing referenced material just makes you look like a clown. Edasent (talk) 23:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now referred to BLPN, see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Peter Holmes à Court redux. – ukexpat (talk) 23:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I warned you earlier not to edit-war to retain clearly unsuitable language and editorial commentary in Peter Holmes à Court (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Because you have ignored this warning, I am blocking you from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit-warring and disregard for the biographies of living persons policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} CIreland (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Everton Dasent (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am the victim of bullying and wheel warring by an editor with more rights than I. The page in question was fully referenced with quotes from verifiable sources and very little editorial. Several sections have been removed altogether because a couple of editors don't like the facts

Decline reason:

You really need to familiarize yourself with WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. Your additions were almost certainly inappropriate, and your edit warring to maintain them was 100% inappropriate. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.