Talk:Assassin's Creed

Assassin's Creed II: Multiplayer

Why was Assassin's Creed II: Multiplayer (2010) for the iPhone removed from the list of games? If no one answers, I may just put it back. Agiar2000 (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Update: I have received a message from the editor who removed Assassin's Creed II: Multiplayer from the list, and he did not realize that it was a separate game for the iPhone. That is why I am placing it back in the list. Agiar2000 (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Why was Assassin's Creed II: Multiplayer (2010) for the iPhone removed from the list of games again? It is a real game that has actually been released already. http://assassinscreed.us.ubi.com/assassins-creed-2/iphone_multi.php Agiar2000 (talk) 11:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed II: Discovery

I did not put up the neutrality dispute tag, but I agree that there is something wrong with that section as it stands. While the first part of it seems okay to me, the rest of it reads more like a review in and of itself than of an encyclopedic article or even an article reporting on a review. I do not think it is appropriate to use words like "guy" or qualitative phrases saying how great something is or isn't as part of an encyclopedic article. I especially do not think it should ever mention the first person, "That's pretty much my only large complaint about Assassin's Creed: Discovery, though." This should not read like someone's blog or personal take on the game. What say you Wikipedians out there? Can we get this cleaned up? If I do not see any responses, I may try to clean it up myself, whenever I can get around to it. Agiar2000 (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. The section seems somewhat personal and subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.52.194 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Games

I'd suggest removing all the games listed after Assassin's Creed III in this section, because 1.) there hasn't been any statements referring to any games past that, and 2.) this series was confirmed as a trilogy, long before the first game was released. All the games listed after AC3 are just speculation and wishful thinking on someone's part. Not only that, but the year that AC3 comes out is speculation as well, we only have one known Assassin's Creed game possibly coming out as late as 2011, and that's Brotherhood. In fact, I'd wait for them to actually announce any more games past Brotherhood before actually listing them or possible release dates for them.

EDIT: I went ahead and fixed it. Removed all the games listed after AC3; changed the release dates for AC: Episodes, AC: Brotherhood, and AC3; and fixed spelling errors. I left Brotherhood and Episodes separate, though it's likely the same game given that they just now acquired the Brotherhood domain.

One more edit, apparently it wants to have that section expanded now that I deleted that, but since I'm new to editing this sort of thing, I'll let someone else deal with that. -  — [Unsigned comment added by 74.133.10.50 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 April 2010.]

It was caused by an error in the table. You'd deleted the close table marker which caused the table to think that the following expand section template was the end marker. - X201 (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed II: Brotherhood

I've reverted the Assassin's Creed II: Brotherhood section back to its original "Episodes" title. All that has happened is that Ubisoft have registered a domain name. There is no evidence that this is for one of the Episode games. It may be for a totally unconnected title or even Assassin's Creed III. To say that Brotherhood is Episodes is total guesswork. - X201 (talk) 08:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood has been confirmed via Kotaku to be the Episodes project. I've gone ahead and updated the page to reflect that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.133.10.50 (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

No. It hasn't been comfirmed to be one of the Episodes games. Only that its an Assassin's Creed title. I have reverted your edit untill there is confirmation that Brotherhood is one of the Episodes games. Either way the Episodes section will need to stay because there is at least one other game that we know nothing about. - X201 (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Considering the fact that the Episodes project (only one game, not more than one as you've stated) was said to be out this fiscal year, I highly doubt it's anything but. In addition, IGN's listings for the Episodes project also redirects to Brotherhood now. And everything listed on the cover of the Brotherhood reserve box is what we were told was the Episodes project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.133.10.50 (talk) 09:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Assassin's III period

Has it been stated for sure that it will take place in the colonial era? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.201.211 (talk) 00:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

No, not by a reliable source. - X201 (talk) 08:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

It states that in the table, maybe we should remove it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.201.211 (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)